People v. Leviyev

Decision Date07 December 1998
Citation681 N.Y.S.2d 766,256 A.D.2d 359
Parties1998 N.Y. Slip Op. 10,808 The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Eliete LEVIYEV, a/k/a Ilya Leviyev, Appellant. . Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Second Department
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Jeffrey T. Schwartz, New York, N.Y., for appellant.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano and Nicole Beder of counsel; Alyssa Eisner on the brief), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Chetta, J.), rendered September 23, 1997, convicting him of burglary in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The decision of whether to grant a defendant permission to withdraw a plea of guilty rests in the sound discretion of the court (see, CPL 220.60[3]; People v. Ochoa, 179 A.D.2d 689, 579 N.Y.S.2d 114). The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the defendant's motion to withdraw his plea of guilty. The record indicates that the defendant's plea was knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily entered (see, People v. Harris, 61 N.Y.2d 9, 471 N.Y.S.2d 61, 459 N.E.2d 170). There is also no support in the record for the defendant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. Furthermore, we find that the defendant's factual allocution was sufficient.

ROSENBLATT, J.P., O'BRIEN, SULLIVAN, KRAUSMAN and FLORIO, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • People v. Boehm, 2004 NY Slip Op 50945(U) (NY 8/30/2004)
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • August 30, 2004
    ...based upon a plea he must demonstrate that the plea was not voluntarily, knowingly and intelligently made. See People v. Leviyev, 256 A.D.2d 359, 681 N.Y.S.2d 766 (2d Dept. 1998); People v. Evans, 204 A.D.2d 346, 614 N.Y.S.2d 151 (2d Dept. 1994); People v. Stevens, 193 A.D.2d 635, 598 N.Y.S......
  • People v. Nesbitt
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • December 7, 1998
  • People v. Richards, 512
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • January 29, 2001
    ...ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed. Contrary to the defendant's contention, his factual allocution was sufficient (see, People v. Leviyev, 256 A.D.2d 359). The defendant's remaining contention is without LAWRENCE J. BRACKEN, ACTING P.J., SONDRA MILLER, LEO F. McGINITY, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT,......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT