People v. Lewis
Decision Date | 30 June 2015 |
Docket Number | 2418/85, 15553, 15552 |
Parties | The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Kenneth LEWIS, Defendant–Appellant. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
129 A.D.3d 637
14 N.Y.S.3d 328
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 05604
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent
v.
Kenneth LEWIS, Defendant–Appellant.
2418/85, 15553, 15552
Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
June 30, 2015.
Ostrer & Associates, P.C., Chester (Benjamin Ostrer of counsel), for appellant.
Robert T. Johnson, District Attorney, Bronx (Rafael Curbelo of counsel), for respondent.
TOM, J.P., ACOSTA, ANDRIAS, MOSKOWITZ, CLARK, JJ.
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Richard Lee Price, J.), entered on or about July 11, 2014, which denied defendant's CPL 440.10 motion to vacate a judgment of conviction rendered January 21, 1986, unanimously affirmed. Appeal from order (same court and Justice), entered on or about March 19, 2014, unanimously dismissed, as subsumed within the appeal from the July 11, 2014 order.
The court's summary denial of the motion (45 Misc.3d 396, 989 N.Y.S.2d 590 [Sup.Ct. Bronx County] ) was proper, because there was
no factual dispute that was sufficient to warrant a hearing. Defendant's 1986 conviction arose from his arrest for possession of a revolver that was defaced, thereby constituting a nonviolent felony under Penal Law § 265.05(3), and that was also “loaded” in the sense of being accompanied by ammunition (see Penal Law § 265.00[15] ), thereby constituting a violent felony under former Penal Law § 265.05(4).
To the extent defendant is claiming that his 1986 conviction was not in fact a violent felony conviction, we note that defendant did not challenge the use of that conviction as a predicate violent felony at his 1990 adjudication as a second violent felony offender. Moreover, the 1986 conviction was similarly employed in adjudicating defendant a persistent violent felony offender in 2000, and this Court specifically upheld that...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Soho Snacks Inc. v. Frangioudakis
...allege, inter alia, that defendants, as the persons responsible for the corporation's day-to-day operations, improperly diverted 129 A.D.3d 637corporate opportunities to other companies owned by them, excluding plaintiffs from those opportunities. The motion court correctly found that the c......
-
People v. Murphy
...of a violent felony," which "are plainly collateral and contingent," were insufficient to invalidate his plea (People v Lewis, 129 A.D.3d 637, 638 [1st Dept 2015], lv denied 26 N.Y.3d 1009 [2015]; see People v Kaufman, 109 A.D.3d 1005, 1006 [2d Dept 2013], lv denied 22 N.Y.3d 1041 [2013]). ......
-
People v. Tendilla
...is not compelled to advise a 50 Misc.3d 874defendant about the collateral consequences of a guilty plea (see id.; People v. Lewis, 129 A.D.3d 637, 638, 14 N.Y.S.3d 328 [1st Dept. 2015] ; People v. Astwood, 122 A.D.3d 936, 937, 998 N.Y.S.2d 113 [2d Dept.2014] ). Nevertheless, an attorney mus......