People v. Lewis

Decision Date10 May 2012
Citation95 A.D.3d 1442,2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 03679,944 N.Y.S.2d 388
PartiesThe PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Adam LEWIS, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Bruce E. Knoll, Albany, for appellant.

Robert M. Carney, District Attorney, Schenectady (Gerald A. Dwyer of counsel), for respondent.

Before: ROSE, J.P., SPAIN, MALONE JR., KAVANAGH and McCARTHY, JJ.

KAVANAGH, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Schenectady County(Giardino, J.), rendered July 24, 2009, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crimes of attempted murder in the second degree, assault in the first degree, burglary in the first degree (two counts), aggravated criminal contempt (two counts), attempted burglary in the second degree, endangering the welfare of a child (three counts), criminal mischief in the fourth degree (five counts), aggravated harassment in the second degree (three counts) and harassment in the second degree.

In December 2008, defendant was charged by indictment with, among other things, attempted murder in the second degree, assault in the first degree and two counts of burglary in the first degree, all stemming from six separate incidents in which it was alleged that defendant, over a period time, had assaulted and harassed the victim.Ultimately, defendant was alleged to have forced his way into the victim's home, where he stabbed her in the back and abdomen with a sharp object.1After defendant was arrested, he made numerous statements to the police admitting his prior contact with the victim and his forcible entry into her home where he attacked her with a piece of glass.2Defendant moved to suppress these statements but, after a hearing, defendant's motion was denied.Thereafter, defendant pleaded guilty to the entire indictment, waived his right to appeal and was sentenced to an aggregate term of 14 years in prison, plus five years of postrelease supervision.3Defendant now appeals.

Initially, defendant claims that the waiver of his right to appeal was unenforceable because he received no consideration in return for executing it and because it required that he give up rights that could not be legally waived.We note that defendant, in addition to executing a written waiver of appeal, confirmed in open court with counsel present that he fully understood he was waiving his right to appeal and stated that “from this point forward, I fully accept the conditions set forth by the court on this case and I have no right to appeal any decision that the judge makes.”In addition, defendant acknowledged in his written waiver that he understood that his right to appeal was separate and distinct from his guilty plea and that he could not appeal, among other things, rulings made on his motion to suppress or the sentence that would be imposed as a result of his guilty plea.It does not follow that because defendant agreed to waive other rights, his appeal waiver was unenforceable or was not knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily entered.Also, County Court agreed, in return for his guilty plea to the entire indictment, that defendant's sentence would be between a range of 12 to 15 years ( comparePeople v. Coles,13 A.D.3d 665–666, 786 N.Y.S.2d 595[2004] ).Given this record, we conclude that defendant knowingly and intelligently waived his right to appeal and that the waiver was fully enforceable ( seePeople v. Bradshaw,18 N.Y.3d 257, 264–266, 938 N.Y.S.2d 254, 961 N.E.2d 645[2011];People v. Lindsey,93 A.D.3d 1040, 940 N.Y.S.2d 492[2012] ).As for County Court's statement during the plea allocution that defendant could “always appeal if [the court] lied to you or tried to mislead you,” in our view, this did not have any impact on the integrity of defendant's guilty plea or his wavier of the right to appeal.

Defendant's valid waiver of his...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
8 cases
  • People v. Tucker
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 10 Mayo 2012
  • People v. Ferro
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 13 Diciembre 2012
    ...waiver, we further conclude that he validly waived his right to appeal from the conviction and sentence ( see People v. Lewis, 95 A.D.3d 1442, 1443, 944 N.Y.S.2d 388 [2012],lv. denied19 N.Y.3d 998, 951 N.Y.S.2d 474, 975 N.E.2d 920 [2012] ). Contrary to defendant's claim, his assertion that ......
  • People v. Frasier
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 4 Abril 2013
    ...that County Court erred in its decision following the Wade hearing and in precluding his alibi defense ( see People v. Lewis, 95 A.D.3d 1442, 1443, 944 N.Y.S.2d 388 [2012],lv. denied19 N.Y.3d 998, 951 N.Y.S.2d 474, 975 N.E.2d 920 [2012];People v. Moreno, 86 A.D.3d 863, 864, 927 N.Y.S.2d 487......
  • People v. Baliraj
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 6 Diciembre 2012
    ...regarding his motion for a Dunaway hearing is foreclosed by the valid waiver of the right to appeal ( see People v. Lewis, 95 A.D.3d 1442, 1443, 944 N.Y.S.2d 388 [2012],lv. denied19 N.Y.3d 998, 951 N.Y.S.2d 474, 975 N.E.2d 920 [2012];People v. White, 75 A.D.3d 837, 838, 905 N.Y.S.2d 681 [20......
  • Get Started for Free