People v. Lieto
| Decision Date | 30 September 1991 |
| Citation | 575 N.Y.S.2d 494,176 A.D.2d 353 |
| Parties | The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Dominick LIETO, Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Deren, Genett & Macreery, P.C., Katonah (John Brian Macreery, of counsel), for appellant.
Carl A. Vergari, Dist. Atty., White Plains (Robert K. Sauer and Richard E. Weill, of counsel), for respondent.
Before THOMPSON, J.P., and BRACKEN, LAWRENCE and EIBER, JJ.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Kepner, J.), rendered June 7, 1989, convicting him of criminal possession of stolen property in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, on the law, the indictment is dismissed and the matter is remitted to the County Court, Westchester County for the purpose of entering an order in its discretion pursuant to CPL 160.50.
The defendant stands convicted of criminal possession of stolen property in the first degree under former section 165.50 of the Penal Law. The first two counts of the indictment charged the defendant with separate offenses of grand larceny in the second degree committed as part of an insurance fraud scheme. The indictment alleged that the defendant had stolen a 1977 Cadillac previously registered to his wife Carol Lieto. On the trial the theory of the People on their direct case was that Carol Lieto falsely reported to her insurance carrier Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (hereinafter Liberty Mutual) that her 1977 Cadillac was stolen but that the vehicle was continuously held in her and the defendant's possession. The indictment further alleged in the second count that the defendant had stolen the insurance proceeds paid by Liberty Mutual to his wife in satisfaction of her false claim. The trial court dismissed the two counts of the indictment charging the defendant with the larceny of the 1977 Cadillac and the insurance proceeds, after the defense rested, finding that the evidence was legally insufficient to convict the defendant of those counts. The third count of the indictment, upon which the defendant was found guilty, charged him with criminally possessing stolen property, i.e., the 1977 Cadillac.
An essential element of the crime of criminal possession of stolen property in the first degree is proof that the property in question was stolen (see, Penal Law § 165.54 [former § 165.50]; People v. Walker, 198 N.Y. 329, 91 N.E. 806; ...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People v. D'Alvia
...and absolving Lieto of any wrongdoing. Meanwhile, Rizzo informed Assistant District Attorney Benedict Palazzolo who was in charge of the Lieto case that his affidavit was procured in exchange for a promised payment of $1,000 upon execution of the affidavit and an additional payment of sever......
-
People v. Spencer
...People v. Alamo, 34 N.Y.2d 453, 358 N.Y.S.2d 375, 315 N.E.2d 446; People v. Neary, 189 A.D.2d 828, 592 N.Y.S.2d 464; People v. Lieto, 176 A.D.2d 353, 575 N.Y.S.2d 494; see also, Penal Law §§ 155.05, ...
- People v. Lenahan