People v. Lockridge, Docket No. 149073.

• Citation: 496 Mich. 852,846 N.W.2d 925
• Decision Date: 11 June 2014
• Docket Number: Docket No. 149073.,COA No. 310649.
• Parties: PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Rahim Omarkhan LOCKRIDGE, Defendant–Appellant.
• Court: Michigan Supreme Court

496 Mich. 852
846 N.W.2d 925

PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff–Appellee,
v.
Rahim Omarkhan LOCKRIDGE, Defendant–Appellant.

Docket No. 149073.
COA No. 310649.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

June 11, 2014.

Prior report: 304 Mich.App. 278, ––– N.W.2d ––––.

Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 13, 2014 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall address: (1) whether a judge's determination of the appropriate sentencing guidelines range, MCL 777.1, et seq., establishes a “mandatory minimum sentence,” such that the facts used to score the offense variables must be admitted by the defendant or established beyond a reasonable doubt to the trier of fact, Alleyne v. United States, 570 U.S. ––––, 133 S.Ct. 2151, 186 L.Ed.2d 314 (2013); and (2) whether the fact that a judge may depart downward from the sentencing guidelines range for “substantial and compelling” reasons, MCL 769.34(3), prevents the sentencing guidelines from being a “mandatory minimum” under Alleyne, see United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005).

The Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan and the Criminal Defense Attorneys of Michigan are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.