People v. Logan

• Decision Date: 04 February 2015
• Parties: The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Robert LOGAN, appellant.
• Court: New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

125 A.D.3d 688
999 N.Y.S.2d 753 (Mem)
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 00909

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent
v.
Robert LOGAN, appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Feb. 4, 2015.

Neal D. Futerfas, White Plains, N.Y., for appellant.

999 N.Y.S.2d 754

Madeline Singas, Acting District Attorney, Mineola, N.Y. (Donald Berk of counsel; Matthew C. Frankel on the brief), for respondent.

Opinion

Appeals by the defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Sullivan, J.), both rendered October 13, 2011, convicting him of criminal contempt in the first degree, criminal contempt in the second degree, and assault in the third degree under Superior Court Information No. 1229/07, and attempted burglary in the second degree under Indictment No. 2426/07, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

ORDERED that the judgments are affirmed.

The defendant's contentions that the Supreme Court erred in imposing multiple surcharges and fees, and that the surcharges and fees imposed were excessive, are precluded by his valid waivers of the right to appeal (see People v. Bradshaw, 18 N.Y.3d 257, 265, 938 N.Y.S.2d 254, 961 N.E.2d 645 ; People v. Callahan, 80 N.Y.2d 273, 280, 590 N.Y.S.2d 46, 604 N.E.2d 108 ; People v. Seaberg, 74 N.Y.2d 1, 11, 543 N.Y.S.2d 968, 541 N.E.2d 1022 ; People v. Morales, 119 A.D.3d 1082, 1084, 990 N.Y.S.2d 144 ; People v. Frazier, 57 A.D.3d 1460, 1461, 869 N.Y.S.2d 826 ; People v. Lemos, 34 A.D.3d 343, 824 N.Y.S.2d 289 ).

The defendant's remaining contention is without merit.

DILLON, J.P., CHAMBERS, AUSTIN and HINDS–RADIX, JJ., concur.