People v. Luna

Decision Date07 July 2021
Docket Number2019–03760,Ind. No. 1397/18
Citation147 N.Y.S.3d 421 (Mem),196 A.D.3d 510
Parties The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Carlos LUNA, appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Salvatore C. Adamo, New York, NY, for appellant.

Timothy D. Sini, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Alfred J. Croce of counsel), for respondent.

MARK C. DILLON, J.P., LEONARD B. AUSTIN, COLLEEN D. DUFFY, BETSY BARROS, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Anthony Senft, Jr., J.), rendered March 15, 2019, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the record demonstrates that he knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal ( see People v. Thomas, 34 N.Y.3d 545, 564–565, 122 N.Y.S.3d 226, 144 N.E.3d 970 ; People v. Sanders, 25 N.Y.3d 337, 12 N.Y.S.3d 593, 34 N.E.3d 344 ; People v. Lopez, 6 N.Y.3d 248, 811 N.Y.S.2d 623, 844 N.E.2d 1145 ). The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes appellate review of his contentions that his sentence was excessive ( see People v. Batista, 167 A.D.3d 69, 75, 86 N.Y.S.3d 492 ), that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel ( see People v. Cardona, 177 A.D.3d 647, 109 N.Y.S.3d 879 ), and that the hearing court erred in not suppressing physical evidence seized at a traffic stop ( see People v. Kemp, 94 N.Y.2d 831, 703 N.Y.S.2d 59, 724 N.E.2d 754 ; People v. Jones, 186 A.D.3d 856, 127 N.Y.S.3d 325 ).

DILLON, J.P., AUSTIN, DUFFY and BARROS, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT