People v. Macedonio

Decision Date30 June 1977
Citation366 N.E.2d 1355,397 N.Y.S.2d 1002,42 N.Y.2d 944
Parties, 366 N.E.2d 1355 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Carl MACEDONIO, Appellant.
CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals

Gerald J. Callahan, Commack, John F. Middlemiss, Jr., Hauppauge and Leon J. Kesner, Bay Shore, for appellant.

Henry F. O'Brien, Dist. Atty. (Kevin J. Crowley, Middle Island, of counsel), for respondent.

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and a new trial ordered.

Once the lawyer entered the criminal proceeding representing the defendant in connection with criminal charges under investigation, it was impermissible to question defendant in custody and in the absence of his attorney (People v. Ramos, 40 N.Y.2d 610, 614, 389 N.Y.S.2d 299, 302, 357 N.E.2d 955, 958; People v. Hobson, 39 N.Y.2d 479, 481, 384 N.Y.S.2d 419, 420, 348 N.E.2d 894, 896). Proof that defendant had type "A" blood and that the semen found within the victim was emitted from a male with blood of that type should not have been admitted, in view of the large proportion of the general population having blood of said type (People v. Robinson, 27 N.Y.2d 864, 317 N.Y.S.2d 19, 265 N.E.2d 543).

BREITEL, C. J., and JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE, JJ., concur in memorandum.

Order reversed, etc.

To continue reading

Request your trial
26 cases
  • Relay Imp. Ass'n v. Sycamore Realty Co., Inc.
    • United States
    • Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
    • September 1, 1994
    ... ... July 5, 1995 ...         [661 A.2d 184] ... Page 705 ... Peter Max Zimmerman (Carole S. DeMilio, on the brief for appellant, People's Counsel for Baltimore County, of Towson, J. Carroll Holzer and Holzer and Lee on the brief for appellant, Relay, Towson), for appellants ... ...
  • Bryant v. Thomas
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • August 3, 2017
    ...299 n.4, 452 N.Y.S.2d 6, 437 N.E.2d 265 (1982) (citing Robinson as support without much elaboration); People v. Macedonio, 42 N.Y.2d 944, 397 N.Y.S.2d 1002, 366 N.E.2d 1355 (1977) (same); see also People v. Mountain, 66 N.Y.2d 197, 201, 495 N.Y.S.2d 944, 486 N.E.2d 802 (1985) (overturning R......
  • People v. Rosa
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals
    • July 11, 1985
    ...871, 430 N.Y.S.2d 43, 407 N.E.2d 1340; People v. Singer, 44 N.Y.2d 241, 251, 405 N.Y.S.2d 17, 376 N.E.2d 179; People v. Macedonio, 42 N.Y.2d 944, 397 N.Y.S.2d 1002, 366 N.E.2d 1355).2 The burden of proof in Federal cases with respect to voluntariness is also on the People but they need prov......
  • People v. Pepper
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals
    • June 16, 1981
    ...869, 430 N.Y.S.2d 43, 407 N.E.2d 1340; People v. Singer, 44 N.Y.2d 241, 251, 405 N.Y.S.2d 17, 376 N.E.2d 179; People v. Macedonio, 42 N.Y.2d 944, 397 N.Y.S.2d 1002, 366 N.E.2d 1355). In counterpoint, we have denied retroactive application where that process has been exhausted (People v. Woo......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT