People v. Madrigal
| Court | New York Supreme Court Appellate Division |
| Citation | 939 N.Y.S.2d 714,93 A.D.3d 651,2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 01663 |
| Decision Date | 06 March 2012 |
| Parties | PEOPLE of State of New York, respondent, v. Georvie A. MADRIGAL, appellant. |
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 01663
93 A.D.3d 651
939 N.Y.S.2d 714
PEOPLE of State of New York, respondent,
v.
Georvie A. MADRIGAL, appellant.
Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
March 6, 2012.
Robert C. Mitchell, Riverhead, N.Y. (James H. Miller III of counsel), for appellant.
Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Michael J. Miller of counsel), for respondent.
Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Suffolk County (Kahn, J.), dated January 20, 2011, which, after a hearing, designated him a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6–C. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, in which he moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the defendant.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted ( id.; see Matter of Giovanni S. [ Jasmin A.], 89 A.D.3d 252, 931 N.Y.S.2d 676; People v. Paige, 54 A.D.2d 631, 387 N.Y.S.2d 399; cf. People v. Gonzalez, 47 N.Y.2d 606, 419 N.Y.S.2d 913, 393 N.E.2d 987).
DILLON, J.P., BALKIN, BELEN and AUSTIN, JJ., concur.To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People v. Murphy
...109 A.D.3d 1003, 1004, 971 N.Y.S.2d 479; People v. Arias, 100 A.D.3d 914, 915, 953 N.Y.S.2d 892; People v. Gonzalez, 93 A.D.3d 679, 939 N.Y.S.2d 714), her claim with respect to the voluntariness of the plea survives such a waiver ( see [979 N.Y.S.2d 830]People v. Seaberg, 74 N.Y.2d 1, 10, 5......
-
People v. Haywood
...22 N.Y.3d 1160, 984 N.Y.S.2d 644, 7 N.E.3d 1132; People v. Arias, 100 A.D.3d 914, 953 N.Y.S.2d 892; People v. Gonzalez, 93 A.D.3d 679, 939 N.Y.S.2d 714; cf. [996 N.Y.S.2d 139] People v. Brown, 122 A.D.3d 133, 992 N.Y.S.2d 297). However, his claim regarding the voluntariness of his plea surv......
-
People v. Haywood, 2013-09036
...22 N.Y.3d 1160, 984 N.Y.S.2d 644, 7 N.E.3d 1132 ; People v. Arias, 100 A.D.3d 914, 953 N.Y.S.2d 892 ; People v. Gonzalez, 93 A.D.3d 679, 939 N.Y.S.2d 714 ; cf. People v. 996 N.Y.S.2d 139Brown, 122 A.D.3d 133, 992 N.Y.S.2d 297 ). However, his claim regarding the voluntariness of his plea sur......
-
People v. Yodice,
...Saaverda, 132 A.D.3d 701, 702, 17 N.Y.S.3d 322 ; People v. Frazier, 127 A.D.3d 1229, 7 N.Y.S.3d 523 ; People v. Gonzalez, 93 A.D.3d 679, 939 N.Y.S.2d 714 ; People v. Miles, 268 A.D.2d 489, 489–490, 703 N.Y.S.2d 491 ).Nevertheless, the amended sentence was not excessive (see People v. Suitte......
-
People v. Murphy
...109 A.D.3d 1003, 1004, 971 N.Y.S.2d 479; People v. Arias, 100 A.D.3d 914, 915, 953 N.Y.S.2d 892; People v. Gonzalez, 93 A.D.3d 679, 939 N.Y.S.2d 714), her claim with respect to the voluntariness of the plea survives such a waiver ( see [979 N.Y.S.2d 830]People v. Seaberg, 74 N.Y.2d 1, 10, 5......
-
People v. Haywood
...22 N.Y.3d 1160, 984 N.Y.S.2d 644, 7 N.E.3d 1132; People v. Arias, 100 A.D.3d 914, 953 N.Y.S.2d 892; People v. Gonzalez, 93 A.D.3d 679, 939 N.Y.S.2d 714; cf. [996 N.Y.S.2d 139] People v. Brown, 122 A.D.3d 133, 992 N.Y.S.2d 297). However, his claim regarding the voluntariness of his plea surv......
-
People v. Haywood, 2013-09036
...22 N.Y.3d 1160, 984 N.Y.S.2d 644, 7 N.E.3d 1132 ; People v. Arias, 100 A.D.3d 914, 953 N.Y.S.2d 892 ; People v. Gonzalez, 93 A.D.3d 679, 939 N.Y.S.2d 714 ; cf. People v. 996 N.Y.S.2d 139Brown, 122 A.D.3d 133, 992 N.Y.S.2d 297 ). However, his claim regarding the voluntariness of his plea sur......
-
People v. Yodice,
...Saaverda, 132 A.D.3d 701, 702, 17 N.Y.S.3d 322 ; People v. Frazier, 127 A.D.3d 1229, 7 N.Y.S.3d 523 ; People v. Gonzalez, 93 A.D.3d 679, 939 N.Y.S.2d 714 ; People v. Miles, 268 A.D.2d 489, 489–490, 703 N.Y.S.2d 491 ).Nevertheless, the amended sentence was not excessive (see People v. Suitte......