People v. Maldonado
| Decision Date | 30 December 1993 |
| Parties | The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Ezequiel MALDONADO, Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Philip L. Weinstein, New York City (Harold V. Ferguson, Jr., of counsel), for appellant.
Charles J. Hynes, Dist. Atty., Brooklyn (Roseann B. MacKechnie, Victor Barall, and Seth M. Lieberman of counsel), for respondent.
Before EIBER, J.P., and O'BRIEN, SANTUCCI and JOY, JJ.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Egitto, J.), rendered February 10, 1992, convicting him of sodomy in the first degree (four counts), sexual abuse in the first degree (four counts), and endangering the welfare of a child, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, on the law, and a new trial is ordered. No questions of fact have been raised or considered.
The nine-year-old infant complainant's answers to the highly suggestive preliminary examination conducted by the Trial Judge and the prosecutor demonstrate that she did not have " 'some conception' of the obligations of an oath and the consequences of giving false testimony" (see, People v. Parks, 41 N.Y.2d 36, 46, 390 N.Y.S.2d 848, 359 N.E.2d 358). Although she could differentiate between the truth and a lie, we are not satisfied that her perfunctory, one-word, or nonverbal responses to the mostly leading questions demonstrate that she understood that there is a special moral duty to tell the truth while under oath. Therefore, the trial court erred in allowing that witness to give sworn testimony.
We further find that the court's error in permitting the infant complainant to testify under oath requires reversal and a new trial in the present case. It is well established that a person cannot be convicted of a crime solely on the testimony of an unsworn witness (see, CPL 60.20[3]; see also, People v. Riggio, 144 A.D.2d 951, 534 N.Y.S.2d 262), and when the witness is unsworn, the People must present legally sufficient corroborative evidence which tends to establish the crime and that the defendant committed it (see, People v. Groff, 71 N.Y.2d 101, 109-110, 524 N.Y.S.2d 13, 518 N.E.2d 908). Since the corroborative evidence presented in the case before us was not overwhelming, we find that the court's error in permitting the complainant to testify under oath cannot be deemed harmless (see, People v. Crimmins, 36 N.Y.2d 230, 367 N.Y.S.2d 213, 326...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People v. Brown
...v. Brill, 245 A.D.2d 384, 385, 666 N.Y.S.2d 195, lv. denied 91 N.Y.2d 889, 669 N.Y.S.2d 3, 691 N.E.2d 1029; cf. People v. Maldonado, 199 A.D.2d 563, 606 N.Y.S.2d 258). Even assuming, arguendo, that the child was improperly permitted to give sworn testimony, we conclude that the error is har......
-
People v. Lynch
...We agree with defendant that the court erred in permitting the six-year-old victim to testify under oath (see, People v. Maldonado, 199 A.D.2d 563, 606 N.Y.S.2d 258). That error, however, is harmless because her testimony was sufficiently corroborated by other evidence (see, People v. Green......
-
People v. Velez
...under oath (see, CPL 60.20[2]; see generally, People v. Nisoff, 36 N.Y.2d 560, 566, 369 N.Y.S.2d 686, 330 N.E.2d 638; People v. Maldonado, 199 A.D.2d 563, 606 N.Y.S.2d 258). The complainant's responses during voir dire indicated that he understood the difference between the truth and a lie,......
-
James B., In re
...he understood that he had a moral duty to tell the truth (cf., People v. Brill, 245 A.D.2d 384, 666 N.Y.S.2d 195; People v. Maldonado, 199 A.D.2d 563, 606 N.Y.S.2d 258; People v. Ranum, 122 A.D.2d 959, 506 N.Y.S.2d 105). He knew the difference between the truth and a lie, knew that he would......
-
Table of cases
...326 (1st Dept. 1992), §§ 18:50, 19:60 People v. Malave , 106 A.D.3d 657, 966 N.Y.S.2d 74 (1st Dept. 2013), § 2:240 People v. Maldonado, 199 A.D.2d 563, 606 N.Y.S.2d 258 (2d Dept. 1993), § 14:120 People v. Maldonado, 220 A.D.2d 212, 631 N.Y.S.2d 850 (1st Dept. 1995), § 5:30 People v. Maldona......
-
Witness competence
...telling the truth and lying was properly found competent, even though she said she would lie to protect her mother. People v. Maldonado , 199 A.D.2d 563, 606 N.Y.S.2d 258 (2d Dept. 1993). A nine year old who did not understand the special duty to tell the truth while under oath should not h......
-
Witness competence
...telling the truth and lying was properly found competent, even though she said she would lie to protect her mother. People v. Maldonado , 199 A.D.2d 563, 606 N.Y.S.2d 258 (2d Dept. 1993). A nine year old who did not understand the special duty to tell the truth while under oath should not h......
-
Witness competence
...telling the truth and lying was properly found competent, even though she said she would lie to protect her mother. People v. Maldonado , 199 A.D.2d 563, 606 N.Y.S.2d 258 (2d Dept. 1993). A nine year old who did not understand the special duty to tell the truth while under oath should not h......