People v. Marathon
| Decision Date | 27 October 1983 |
| Parties | The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Alexander M. MARATHON, Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Lewis B. Oliver, Jr., Albany, for appellant.
Sol Greenberg, Dist. Atty., Albany (George H. Barber, Asst. Dist. Atty., Albany, of counsel), for respondent.
Before MAHONEY, P.J., and SWEENEY, KANE, CASEY and YESAWICH, JJ.
Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County, rendered June 8, 1979, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of robbery in the first degree.
In September, 1978, defendant and William DuBray were jointly indicted by the Grand Jury of Albany County and charged with the crimes of robbery in the first degree, burglary in the first degree and grand larceny in the second degree. During the course of a suppression hearing in March, 1979, Judge Clyne granted defense counsel's request to close the courtroom. Thereafter, defendant changed his plea to guilty to the crime of robbery in the first degree in satisfaction of the three-count indictment. Judge Clyne inquired of defendant as to the underlying facts surrounding the plea in order to determine that it was knowing and voluntary. After defendant was sworn under oath, and during the plea colloquy, defendant acknowledged the crime and his participation in it, and also implicated his codefendant, William DuBray.
The closure of the courtroom to the public, and especially to the press, during defendant's plea of guilty became the subject of litigation initiated by the Hearst Corporation, which had been refused a transcript of the plea proceedings until DuBray pleaded guilty five days later. This court, concluding that the closure was a proper exercise of discretion, dismissed the petition (Matter of Hearst Corp. v. Clyne, 71 A.D.2d 966, 419 N.Y.S.2d 338). The Court of Appeals reversed and remitted to this court for dismissal, holding that the case was moot and that there was no sufficient reason to consider the merits of the appeal (Matter of Hearst Corp. v. Clyne, 50 N.Y.2d 707, 431 N.Y.S.2d 400, 409 N.E.2d 876).
On the instant appeal, defendant contends that his guilty plea is a nullity because it was made in an illegally closed courtroom in violation of his right to a public trial. Defendant alleges that he did not knowingly and intelligently waive his right to a public trial and that it was never established that the plea proceedings were...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State v. Beskurt
...Mich. 642, 821 N.W.2d 288 (2012); People v. Pollock, 50 N.Y.2d 547, 550, 407 N.E.2d 472, 429 N.Y.S.2d 628 (1980); People v. Marathon, 97 A.D.2d 650, 469 N.Y.S.2d 178 (1983);State v. Butterfield, 784 P.2d 153, 155–57 (Utah 1989). ¶ 34 We should do the same and join the courts that have recog......
-
Wash v. Sublett
...Mich. 642, 821 N.W.2d 288 (2012); People v. Pollock, 50 N.Y.2d 547, 550, 407 N.E.2d 472, 429 N.Y.S.2d 628 (1980); People v. Marathon, 97 A.D.2d 650, 469 N.Y.S.2d 178 (1983); State v. Butterfield, 784 P.2d 153, 155–57 (Utah 1989). ¶ 127 Thus, review of even so highly valued a right as the ri......
-
Robinson v. State
...to object to courtroom closure constitutes a waiver of the right to challenge the closure on appeal); People v. Marathon, 97 A.D.2d 650, 650, 469 N.Y.S.2d 178 (N.Y.App.Div. 1983) (stating that a defendant can waive his right to a public trial by failing to object to the closure of the court......
-
State v. Frawley
...782 P.2d 627, 651, 264 Cal.Rptr. 386 (1989) (citing People v. Cash, 52 Cal.2d 841, 846, 345 P.2d 462 (1959) ); People v. Marathon, 97 A.D.2d 650, 650, 469 N.Y.S.2d 178 (1983) ; Commonwealth v. Williams, 379 Mass. 874, 401 N.E.2d 376, 378 (1980) ; Wright v. State, 340 So.2d 74, 79–80 (Ala.19......