People v. Mason

Decision Date10 January 1991
Docket NumberNo. 23519,No. S004604,S004604,23519
Citation52 Cal.3d 909,802 P.2d 950,277 Cal.Rptr. 166
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
Parties, 802 P.2d 950 The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. David Edwin MASON, Defendant and Appellant. Crim.

Charles C. Marson, San Francisco, under appointment by the Supreme Court, for defendant and appellant.

John K. Van de Kamp, Atty. Gen., Steve White and Richard B. Iglehart, Chief Asst. Attys. Gen., John H. Sugiyama, Asst. Atty. Gen., Dane R. Gillette, Ronald E. Niver and Catherine A. Rivlin, Deputy Attys. Gen., for plaintiff and respondent.

PANELLI, Associate Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

A jury convicted defendant David Edwin Mason of the murders of Joan Picard, Arthur Jennings, Antoinette Brown, Dorothy Lang, and Boyd Johnson, each in the first degree. ( § 187.) 1 As special circumstances, the jury found that defendant had murdered Picard, Jennings, Brown, and Lang while engaged in the commission of robbery ( § 190.2, subd. (a)(17)(i)) and that defendant had in the same proceeding been convicted of more than one offense of murder in the first degree (id., subd. (a)(3)). 2

The original jury failed to reach a verdict on penalty. A second jury, on retrial of the penalty phase, imposed the sentence of death. We affirm.

II. FACTS
A. Guilt Phase

Between March 9, 1980, and December 7, 1980, defendant entered the homes of, robbed, and strangled four elderly residents of Oakland: Joan Picard (71), Arthur Jennings (83), Antoinette Brown (75), and Dorothy Lang (72). On February 4, 1981, defendant was arrested. On May 9, 1982, defendant murdered Boyd Johnson, an inmate in the Alameda County jail.

1. The Oakland Murders

The prosecution proved that defendant murdered Picard, Jennings, Brown, and Lang primarily through his own admissions. Several weeks before he was arrested, defendant confessed to the four murders in a tape recording that he prepared for his family. Defendant inscribed the tape cassette with the label "David E. Mason--Epitaph." After he was arrested, defendant provided detailed information about the murders to police in four lengthy statements. He also led representatives of the district attorney's office to the places where the murders had occurred.

a. The Murder of Joan Picard

In statements to the police, defendant described Joan Picard's murder in detail. Defendant had known Picard seven or eight years earlier, when he was a teenager. He had done odd jobs for her, such as cleaning and gardening, and considered her a friend. On occasion, Picard invited defendant into her home for refreshments, to talk about religion, and to show him her coin collection. Picard, who was concerned about burglars, also showed defendant her alarm system and its panic buttons.

On March 6, 1980, low on funds, defendant remembered Picard and her coin collection. He took a bus to her home and knocked on her door. Picard, now 73 years old, remembered him and invited him in. Defendant pulled out an ice pick, told Picard that he planned to rob her, and instructed her not to scream or run. Initially, Picard did not believe what defendant was saying. To convince her that he was serious, he told her, falsely, that he was a drug addict.

Defendant led Picard upstairs, where he found $3 under a stack of newspapers in the bedroom. When she attempted to reach the panic button, he pulled her back and choked her until she lost consciousness. When Picard regained consciousness, she told him to take everything. According to defendant, she said: "I'd rather let you have everything [than] to believe that you're doing this." When defendant began to search the house, Picard tried to escape. Defendant tied her wrists with an electrical cord and told her not to move. After finishing his search, which produced the coin collection, defendant returned to Picard. Afraid that she would identify him, he killed her by tightening a ligature around her neck.

Picard's daughter found the body two days later. It had been placed in the pantry behind a closed door. Physical evidence from the crime scene substantially corroborated defendant's later statements. Picard's body was on the floor. Around her neck was a wire, twisted tight with a pencil to form a tourniquet. The larynx and hyoid bones in her neck had been fractured, probably by manual strangulation. Asphyxiation due to strangulation was the cause of death. Picard's hands were tied in the front with an electrical cord that had been cut from a clock radio. The clock radio had stopped at 12:29 p.m. Bruises on her face, neck, chest, and arms indicated a severe beating before death. There were bloodstains in the living room, on the stairway, and in the bedroom. The only clothes left on the body were a blue skirt and a brassiere. A sweater had been forcibly removed; fragments of the buttons were scattered on the floor.

Picard's daughter testified that her mother's coin collection was missing. Defendant admitted selling the coins. A pawnbroker testified that he purchased them from defendant for $85 on March 6, 1980, at 4:40 p.m.

Testifying on his own behalf at trial, defendant admitted involvement in Picard's murder, as he had in the Epitaph Tape and in his statements to police. At trial, however, defendant repudiated his earlier confessions and claimed that he had robbed Picard together with an accomplice, Doug Denard. According to defendant's trial testimony, Denard killed Picard against defendant's wishes while defendant was out of the room.

b. The Murder of Arthur Jennings

In his statements to the police defendant also described his murder of 83-year-old Arthur Jennings. As a teenager, defendant had known Jennings as "Niko," someone who would trade money for sexual favors. Defendant had met Jennings for this purpose several times, most often in Jennings's car but twice in his cottage near defendant's junior high school.

On August 18, 1980, looking for "something to do," defendant knocked on Jennings's door. When the door opened defendant pushed it in, causing Jennings, who walked with a cane, to fall backwards onto the floor. Defendant rushed in and fell on top of him. Jennings swung at defendant and struggled. Defendant punched Jennings, put his hands around Jennings's neck, and strangled him. When Jennings stopped breathing, defendant ransacked the house. Defendant left with Jennings's World War I military service ring and about $16.

A Meals-on-Wheels driver had delivered a meal and spoken to Jennings at about 10:30 a.m. The next day, the driver discovered the body lying on a bed in the front room. Physical evidence substantially corroborated defendant's later statements about the murder. Jennings's spine had fractured in a backwards fall, and he had been severely beaten before death. There were bruises on his face, head, neck, and upper body. His larynx and hyoid bones had multiple fractures. The cause of death was asphyxiation due to manual strangulation. The coroner estimated that Jennings had eaten about an hour before he died, thus placing the time of death at about 11:30 a.m.

At trial, defendant repudiated his earlier statements, claiming that he had never met Jennings and did not kill him. Defendant also presented the alibi that he had been working at Thrift Town, a secondhand shop, on the day Jennings died. Defendant's time card was punched in at 12:31 p.m. and punched out at 9:02 p.m. In rebuttal, the People showed that others could have punched defendant's card. Defendant's brother, who also worked at Thrift Town, punched out for lunch at 12:31 p.m. Karen Worden, defendant's friend, punched out at 9:03 p.m.

c. The Murder of Antoinette Brown

Defendant killed Antoinette Brown, a 75-year-old widow living alone, on November 16, 1980.

The last person who saw Brown alive was Wayne Anderson, a neighbor. At about 4 p.m. on Sunday, November 16, Brown brought Anderson some homemade cookies, and he invited her to Thanksgiving dinner. When Anderson returned from work the next day he saw that Brown's Sunday and Monday newspapers were still at her door. He knocked on her door and telephoned but got no answer. Because Brown still had not collected her newspapers on Tuesday, Anderson called Brown's sister, who had a key to the apartment.

Inside the apartment, Anderson and Brown's sister found the body face down in the bedroom. Around Brown's neck was a knotted ligature fashioned from a silk undergarment. Brown's body was clothed, but her slip had been pulled up above her waist and her brassiere had been pulled down. The autopsy surgeon determined that Brown had died of asphyxiation due to strangulation. Brown had also been beaten before death. There were bruises, scrapes, and cuts over most of her body. In addition, Brown's rings and purse had been taken from the apartment.

A second neighbor, Paula White, testified that she briefly saw a young, male stranger leave the elevator on the first floor at about 4 p.m. During their investigation, police asked White to select a photograph of the stranger from a set of six. She selected photographs of defendant and one other person.

In his statements to the police, defendant occasionally confused Brown's murder with that of Dorothy Lang, his next victim. Defendant did, however, provide many accurate details. Defendant correctly remembered that the murder had occurred at about 4 p.m. Defendant also correctly remembered that Brown had worn a dark colored dress with a flowered design, that she had driven a full-sized American car, that her apartment building had four floors and a balcony facing the street, that she had lived in the front apartment on the second floor, and that the underground garage, which was not visible from the street, had a cord that opened the door automatically. Defendant also drew for police an accurate diagram of Brown's apartment and pointed out to them, from the street, the apartment in which she had died.

At trial, defendant denied any involvement in Brown's...

To continue reading

Request your trial
314 cases
  • People v. Armstrong
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • July 15, 1991
    ...because police manufacture of probable cause for appellant's arrest was circumstantially negated. (See People v. Mason (1991) 52 Cal.3d 909, 944, 277 Cal.Rptr. 166, 802 P.2d 950 ["It is axiomatic that we review the trial court's rulings and not its reasoning. [Citations.]"]; accord, People ......
  • Lopez v. Lopez
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of California
    • September 19, 2013
    ...(People v. Funes (1994) 23 Cal.App .4th 1506, 1519.) In addition, we review the trial court's ruling, not its reasoning. (People v. Mason (1991) 52 Cal.3d 909, 944.)There are innumerable ways in which a document may be authenticated. (People v. Olguin (1994) 31 Cal.App.4th 1355, 1372; Peopl......
  • People v. Steskal
    • United States
    • California Supreme Court
    • April 29, 2021
    ...the defendant did not possess a weapon, but the escape plan would have required him to confront a guard ( People v. Mason (1991) 52 Cal.3d 909, 955–956, 277 Cal.Rptr. 166, 802 P.2d 950 ). In contrast, we have concluded that evidence of escape was not admissible when there was "no evidence t......
  • People v. Capistrano
    • United States
    • California Supreme Court
    • August 4, 2014
    ...of a lesser but inflammatory crime might be used to bolster a weak prosecution case’ on another crime." ( People v. Mason (1991) 52 Cal.3d 909, 934, 277 Cal.Rptr. 166, 802 P.2d 950.) First, it is not the case that the evidence of his participation in the J.S./E.G. and Weir home invasion rob......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
  • Table of cases
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books California Objections
    • March 29, 2023
    ...1119, 97 Cal. Rptr. 2d 439, §10:160 Masajo, People v. (1996) 41 Cal. App. 4th 1335, 49 Cal. Rptr. 2d 234, §22:240 Mason, People v. (1991) 52 Cal. 3d 909, 277 Cal. Rptr. 166, §2:130 Mason, People v. (2013) 218 Cal. App. 4th 818, 160 Cal. Rptr. 3d 516, §22:50 Massey v. Mercy Medical Center Re......
  • Jury selection
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books California Objections
    • March 29, 2023
    ...on an issue or compel prospective jurors to prejudge the case or commit themselves to vote in a particular way. People v. Mason (1991) 52 Cal. 3d 909, 940, 277 Cal Rptr. 166. It is also improper to attempt to determine the prospective juror’s views as to hypothetical cases not before the co......
  • Table of Cases null
    • United States
    • Full Court Press California Guide to Criminal Evidence Table of Cases
    • Invalid date
    ...People v. Mason (Santa Clara Cty. Superior Ct. Appellate Div. 2016) 8 Cal. App. 5th Supp. 11—Ch. 5-A, §3.3.1(3)(f) People v. Mason, 52 Cal. 3d 909, 277 Cal. Rptr. 166, 802 P.2d 950 (1991)—Ch. 1, §4.1; §4.8.4(1) People v. Massie, 142 Cal. App. 4th 365, 48 Cal. Rptr. 3d 304 (3d Dist. 2006)—Ch......
  • Chapter 1 - §4. Relevance of specific evidence
    • United States
    • Full Court Press California Guide to Criminal Evidence Chapter 1 Relevance
    • Invalid date
    ...can also be relevant to establish intent or premeditation, or to corroborate or impeach testimony. See, e.g., People v. Mason (1991) 52 Cal.3d 909, 943-44 (rope found in D's hotel room was relevant to corroborate D's confession); People v. Darling (1st Dist.1989) 210 Cal.App.3d 910, 914 (sc......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT