People v. Massey, Cr. 5394
Decision Date | 08 December 1955 |
Docket Number | Cr. 5394 |
Citation | 137 Cal.App.2d 623,290 P.2d 906 |
Court | California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
Parties | The PEOPLE of the State of California, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Mrs. Mildred Frances MASSEY and Paul George Horner, Defendants, Paul George Horner, Defendant and Appellant. |
Paul K. Duffy, Los Angeles, for appellant.
Edmund G. Brown, Atty. Gen., Norman H. Sokolow, Deputy Atty. Gen., for respondent.
Paul George Horner appeals from judgments adjudging him guilty of several felonies and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
The charges were (1) participating with one Mildred, a co-defendant, in violation of section 288a of the Penal Code on June 15, 1954, (2) participating with said Mildred, a co-defendant, in another violation of the section on the same day, (3) violation of the section committed with one Bonnie on the same day, and (4) conspiracy with said Mildred to commit violations of said section.
The case of Horner and his co-defendant was tried upon testimony given at the preliminary examination and additional testimony received at the trial. Both defendants were convicted of the first three offenses charged and acquitted of the fourth. On behalf of Horner an opening brief was filed by Mr. Dunham, who represented Horner at the trial. He did not appear when the appeal was set for argument. In that brief the only ground urged for reversal was that there was 'no competent or substantial evidence beyond a reasonable doubt to establish the crime.' And the entire argument of the point reads as follows: At the time of the argument Horner was given leave to obtain new counsel and to file an additional brief. This has been done; a brief has been filed by Mr. Duffy.
As to charges 1 and 3 above, appellant on the stand admitted acts of physical contact which were elements of the offenses charged. Bonnie testified to similar acts committed by appellant as evidence of the commission of the second offense above mentioned. In addition there were photographs received in evidence taken at the time of the commission of the several acts charged. These were explained by the witnesses; the subjects of the pictures, appellant and Mildred, were identified and the acts were described. Understandably, it has not been suggested by the appellant that these pictures be brought up and considered as a part of the record on appeal. Defendant's explanation on the stand was that the acts were committed for the sole purpose of obtaining the pictures, but this, even if true, would not necessarily have constituted a valid defense. There was ample evidence of physical contact as a means of committing the offenses, and even if the trial court could have believed it was not the purpose of the participants to gratify sexual desires, that was not a conclusion which the court was required to reach as the only reasonable...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Hawk v. Superior Court
...an attorney, as an officer of the court, owes a duty of respect for the court as well as fidelity to his client (People v. Massey (1955) 137 Cal.App.2d 623, 626, 290 P.2d 906; Bus. & Prof. Code, § 6068, subd. (b); 1 Witkin, Cal. Procedure (2d ed.), Attorneys, § 2, p. 11; Standard 7.1(a) ABA......
-
People v. Cline
...108 Cal.App.2d 84, 88, 238 P.2d 158, 160. See also People v. Hunter (1958) 158 Cal.App.2d 500, 505, 322 P.2d 942; People v. Massey (1955), 137 Cal.App.2d 623, 625, 290 P.2d 906; and 1 Witkin, California Crimes, §§ 543--544, pp. 495--496.)3 Section 288a further provides: '* * * whenever any ......
-
People v. Prince
...not abandon his representation at will, nor for considerations personal to himself. Bus. & Prof.Code § 6068.' (People v. Massey (1955) 137 Cal.App.2d 623, 626, 290 P.2d 906, 907.) The question of granting or denying an application of an attorney to withdraw as counsel (Code Civ.Proc. § 284,......
-
People v. Dement
...to exclude the ‘mere kiss or lick of the private organ, even though lewdly done’ ” has been repudiated); People v. Massey (1955) 137 Cal.App.2d 623, 624–625, 290 P.2d 906 (relying on Harris, supra, 108 Cal.App.2d 84, 238 P.2d 158, to say that word “copulating” has a well-understood meaning)......