People v. McCray
Decision Date | 12 July 1983 |
Citation | 467 N.Y.S.2d 1031,60 N.Y.2d 587 |
Parties | , 454 N.E.2d 127 People v. McCray (Michael) NO. 676 |
Court | New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
To continue reading
Request your trial3 cases
-
McCray v. Abrams
... ... In support of this contention, McCray pointed out that "[t]here have been seven black people and one Hispanic ven[ire]man up to this point. [The prosecutor] has challenged each and every one of them. Of her eleven challenges, she has used eight to challenge blacks and Hispanics." (Transcript of hearing dated April 24, 1980, at 5.) McCray requested a hearing at which the prosecutor ... ...
-
People v. Barnes
... ... We conclude that the trial court abused its discretion in excluding April Edwards' testimony ... In view of the foregoing it is unnecessary to reach the defendant's contention (based on McCray v. Abrams, (2nd Cir.), 750 F.2d 1113, but see People v. Charles, 61 N.Y.2d 321, 473 N.Y.S.2d 941, 462 ... N.E.2d 118, and People v. McCray, 57 N.Y.2d 542, 457 N.E.2d 441, 443 N.E.2d 915, cert. den. 461 U.S. 961, 103 S.Ct. 2438, 77 L.Ed.2d 1322) that his constitutional rights were infringed by the ... ...
-
People v. Cassell
... ... We decline to reach this contention because the voir dire was not recorded and there is no basis in the record to ascertain whether defendant established a prima facie case of discrimination (see People v. Charles, 61 N.Y.2d 321, 473 N.Y.S.2d 941, 462 N.E.2d 118; People v. McCray, 57 N.Y.2d 542, 546, 457 N.Y.S.2d 441, 443 N.E.2d 915, cert den 461 U.S. 961, 103 S.Ct. 2438, 77 L.Ed.2d 1322, mot. for rearg. den. 60 N.Y.2d 587, 467 N.Y.S.2d 1031, 454 N.E.2d 127). We have considered the other points raised by the defendant and find each of them lacking in merit ... ...