People v. McDonald

Decision Date29 March 2000
Citation270 A.D.2d 955,705 N.Y.S.2d 308
PartiesTHE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent,<BR>v.<BR>EARL E. McDONALD, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Present — Pine, J. P., Wisner, Hurlbutt, Kehoe and Lawton, JJ.

Judgment unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum:

We reject the contention of defendant that his waiver of the right to appeal was not knowing and intelligent (see, People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273, 280). No particular litany is required for an effective waiver of the right to appeal (see, People v Kemp, 94 NY2d 831). Defendant entered a negotiated plea that was conditioned upon waiver of the right to appeal. He entered that plea upon the advice of defense counsel after discussing the waiver with him. Defendant acknowledged his right to appeal and expressly stated that he wished to waive that right. That waiver encompasses the right to challenge the severity of the sentence (see, People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 737). In any event, the sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe.

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • People v. Dunham
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • April 1, 2011
    ...the face of the record” ( People v. Lopez, 6 N.Y.3d 248, 256, 811 N.Y.S.2d 623, 844 N.E.2d 1145; see People v. McDonald, 270 A.D.2d 955, 705 N.Y.S.2d 308, lv. denied 95 N.Y.2d 800, 711 N.Y.S.2d 168, 733 N.E.2d 240). “The record must establish that the defendant understood that the right to ......
  • People v. Streeter
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • March 19, 2010
    ...706). It is well settled that [n]o particular litany is required for an effective waiver of the right to appeal ( People v. McDonald, 270 A.D.2d 955, 705 N.Y.S.2d 308, lv. denied 95 N.Y.2d 800, 711 N.Y.S.2d 168, 733 N.E.2d 240; see People v. Callahan, 80 N.Y.2d 273, 283, 590 N.Y.S.2d 46, 60......
  • People v. Kozody
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • June 18, 2010
    ...572). It is well settled that [n]o particular litany is required for an effective waiver of the right to appeal ( People v. McDonald, 270 A.D.2d 955, 705 N.Y.S.2d 308, lv. denied 95 N.Y.2d 800, 711 N.Y.S.2d 168, 733 N.E.2d 240; see People v. Callahan, 80 N.Y.2d 273, 283, 590 N.Y.S.2d 46, 60......
  • People v. Fisher
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • April 20, 2012
    ...of the right to appeal is invalid. “No particular litany is required for an effective waiver of the right to appeal” ( People v. McDonald, 270 A.D.2d 955, 705 N.Y.S.2d 308, lv. denied 95 N.Y.2d 800, 711 N.Y.S.2d 168, 733 N.E.2d 240; see People v. Moissett, 76 N.Y.2d 909, 910–911, 563 N.Y.S.......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT