People v. McDowell

Decision Date01 November 1993
Citation604 N.Y.S.2d 801,198 A.D.2d 236
PartiesThe PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Curtis McDOWELL, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Abraham B. Strassfeld, Brooklyn, for appellant.

Charles J. Hynes, Dist. Atty., Brooklyn (Roseann B. MacKechnie and Keith Dolan, of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Pesce, J.), rendered October 16, 1991, convicting him of attempted robbery in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

We find no merit to the defendant's contention that he should have been permitted to withdraw his plea of guilty. The decision to permit the withdrawal of a plea of guilty rests within the sound discretion of the court (see, CPL 220.60[3]; People v. Dickerson, 163 A.D.2d 610, 559 N.Y.S.2d 40). The defendant's unsupported, conclusory allegation of innocence at sentencing did not warrant the vacatur of his plea (see, People v. Chestnut, 188 A.D.2d 480, 590 N.Y.S.2d 906; People v. Dickerson, supra; People v. Bourdonnay, 160 A.D.2d 1014, 555 N.Y.S.2d 134). Accordingly, it was not an improvident exercise of the court's discretion to deny the defendant's motion to withdraw his plea without holding a hearing (see, People v. Chestnut, supra; People v. Dickerson, supra).

THOMPSON, J.P., and SULLIVAN, MILLER, RITTER and SANTUCCI, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • People v. Maupin
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • November 1, 1993
  • People v. McDowell
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • January 19, 1994

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT