People v. Mcfarren
| Decision Date | 14 April 2011 |
| Citation | 921 N.Y.S.2d 391,83 A.D.3d 1209,2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 02968 |
| Parties | The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent,v.Jimmy McFARREN, Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Michael I. Getz, Clifton Park, for appellant.Kevin C. Kortright, District Attorney, Fort Edward (Devin J. Anderson of counsel), for respondent.Before: PETERS, J.P., SPAIN, KAVANAGH, STEIN and McCARTHY, JJ.PETERS, J.P.
Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Washington County (McKeighan, J.), rendered July 17, 2009, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree.
In a four-count indictment returned against defendant and a codefendant, defendant was charged with criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree. Pursuant to a plea agreement, defendant pleaded guilty to criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree and waived his right to appeal. County Court thereafter sentenced defendant to the agreed-upon sentence of three years in prison, to be followed by three years of postrelease supervision. Defendant now appeals and we affirm.
Defendant's contention that his plea was not voluntarily, knowingly and intelligently entered due to mental incompetency survives his waiver of the right to appeal but is unpreserved for our review due to his failure to move to withdraw his plea or vacate the judgment of conviction ( see People v. Coons, 73 A.D.3d 1343, 1344, 901 N.Y.S.2d 406 [2010], lv. denied 15 N.Y.3d 803, 908 N.Y.S.2d 163, 934 N.E.2d 897 [2010]; People v. Dantzler, 63 A.D.3d 1376, 1377, 881 N.Y.S.2d 222 [2009], lv. denied 14 N.Y.3d 799, 899 N.Y.S.2d 133, 925 N.E.2d 937 [2010] ). Moreover, defendant did not make any statements during the allocution that negated an essential element of the crime or otherwise cast doubt upon his guilt so as to trigger the exception to the preservation requirement ( see People v. McKenzie, 66 A.D.3d 1056, 1057, 887 N.Y.S.2d 685 [2009]; People v. Dixon, 62 A.D.3d 1214, 1214, 879 N.Y.S.2d 631 [2009], lv. denied 13 N.Y.3d 743, 886 N.Y.S.2d 97, 914 N.E.2d 1015 [2009] ). In any event, the record does not reflect that defendant lacked the capacity to enter a voluntary, knowing and intelligent plea. Although defendant informed County Court that he had previously suffered a brain injury in a motor vehicle accident, the court confirmed that defendant understood the proceedings and was able to clearly communicate with counsel, and he affirmed that there was nothing mentally or physically compromising his ability to enter a knowing plea. Accordingly, we would also conclude that County Court did not abuse its discretion by accepting defendant's plea without holding a CPL article 730 competency hearing ( see People v. Sorey, 55 A.D.3d 1063, 1064, 866 N.Y.S.2d 393 [2008], lv. denied 11 N.Y.3d 930, 874 N.Y.S.2d 16, 902 N.E.2d 450 [2009] ).
Defendant's claim that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel by counsel's failure to request a CPL article 730 competency hearing, although not precluded by his appeal waiver as it relates to the voluntariness of his plea, is similarly unpreserved for our review due to his failure to move to withdraw his plea or vacate the judgment of conviction (...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People v. Lewis
...( see People v. Dickson, 21 A.D.3d at 647, 799 N.Y.S.2d 657; People v. Johnson, 224 A.D.2d 635, 638, 639 N.Y.S.2d 409 [1996], lv. denied [83 A.D.3d 1209] 88 N.Y.2d 849, 644 N.Y.S.2d 695, 667 N.E.2d 345 [1996] ). Even if we were to assume that the statements were erroneously admitted, we wou......
-
People v. Chavis
...to request a competency hearing—survive his appeal waiver because they impact the voluntariness of his plea ( see People v. McFarren, 83 A.D.3d 1209, 1210, 921 N.Y.S.2d 391 [2011],lv. denied17 N.Y.3d 860, 932 N.Y.S.2d 26, 956 N.E.2d 807 [2011] ), defendant did not preserve them by a proper ......
-
People v. Hennessey
...of his guilty plea, and so his waiver of the right to appeal does not preclude him from raising this issue ( see People v. McFarren, 83 A.D.3d 1209, 1210, 921 N.Y.S.2d 391 [2011], lv. denied17 N.Y.3d 860, 932 N.Y.S.2d 26, 956 N.E.2d 807 [2011]; People v. Ashley, 71 A.D.3d 1286, 1287, 896 N.......
-
People v. Wilson
...appellate review his contention that his plea of guilty was not knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently made (see People v. McFarren, 83 A.D.3d 1209, 1209, 921 N.Y.S.2d 391 ). In any event, the record demonstrates that the defendant understood the proceedings and was not impaired by the m......