People v. McGhee

Decision Date26 May 2009
Docket Number2008-03806.
PartiesTHE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CHENE McGHEE, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

A motion to withdraw a plea of guilty rests within the sound discretion of the County Court (see People v Seeber, 4 NY3d 780 [2005]; People v Mann, 32 AD3d 865 [2006]; People v Kucharczyk, 15 AD3d 595 [2005]), whose determination generally will not be disturbed absent an improvident exercise of discretion (see People v DeLeon, 40 AD3d 1008 [2007]). In this case, the defendant entered her plea of guilty knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently, having reached a favorable plea bargain with the assistance of competent counsel with whose representation the defendant was satisfied (see People v Mann, 32 AD3d 865 [2006]). The defendant's generalized and unsubstantiated claim of coercion was not sufficient to warrant the vacatur of the plea of guilty.

MASTRO, J.P., FISHER, FLORIO and ENG, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • People v. Visconti
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • June 20, 2012
    ...826 N.E.2d 797;People v. Amanze, 87 A.D.3d 1159, 929 N.Y.S.2d 876;People v. Wiedmer, 71 A.D.3d 1067, 896 N.Y.S.2d 686;People v. McGhee, 62 A.D.3d 1027, 878 N.Y.S.2d 911;CPL 220.60 [3] ). The record reflects that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered his plea of gui......
  • People v. Hughes
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • May 26, 2009
  • People v. McGhee
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • July 27, 2009
  • People v. Pallonetti
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • May 26, 2009

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT