People v. McKinney

Decision Date31 January 2012
Citation937 N.Y.S.2d 507,91 A.D.3d 1300,2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 00568
PartiesThe PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Vanessa McKINNEY, Defendant–Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Timothy P. Donaher, Public Defender, Rochester, Covington & Burling LLP, New York City (Brian D. Ginsberg of Counsel), for DefendantAppellant.

Michael C. Green, District Attorney, Rochester (Nancy Gilligan of Counsel), for Respondent.

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND GORSKI, JJ.

MEMORANDUM:

Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting her following a jury trial of, inter alia, leaving the scene of a personal injury incident as a class D felony (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 600[2][a] ). As defendant contends, and the People correctly conceded at oral argument of this appeal, the indictment as filed charged defendant with only a class E felony under section 600(2)(a), for having caused “serious physical injury” to the victim, and thus Supreme Court erred in granting the People's oral motion at trial to amend the indictment to allege that the victim died, thereby raising the offense to a class D felony ( see § 600[2][c] ). Because the People proved at trial beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant left the scene of a personal injury incident that resulted in serious physical injury to another person, we modify the judgment by reducing the conviction from a class D felony to a class E felony. Inasmuch as defendant has already served the maximum term of imprisonment permitted for the class E felony, there is no need to remit the matter to Supreme Court for resentencing on count one ( see People v. Jackson, 269 A.D.2d 867, 703 N.Y.S.2d 804, lv. denied 95 N.Y.2d 798, 711 N.Y.S.2d 166, 733 N.E.2d 238). Rather, in the interest of judicial economy, we instead further modify the judgment by vacating the sentence imposed on count one and by imposing the maximum allowed for a class E felony, i.e., an indeterminate term of imprisonment of 1 1/3 to 4 years.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law by reducing the conviction of leaving the scene of a personal injury incident without reporting as a class D felony under Vehicle and Traffic Law § 600(2) to leaving the scene of a personal injury incident without reporting as a class E felony and by vacating the sentence imposed on count one of the indictment and imposing a sentence of 1 1/3 to 4 years on that...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • People v. Malcolm
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 16 September 2015
    ...allowed for the class A misdemeanor of petit larceny, we would need not remit for resentencing on that count (see People v. McKinney, 91 A.D.3d 1300, 937 N.Y.S.2d 507 ...
  • People v. Clark
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 29 April 2016
    ...(see Penal Law §§ 70.15[1] ; 70.35), there is no need to remit the matter to Supreme Court for resentencing (see People v. McKinney, 91 A.D.3d 1300, 1300, 937 N.Y.S.2d 507 ). In the interest of judicial economy, we further modify the judgment by vacating the sentence imposed on count three ......
  • People v. Santiago
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 11 June 2021
    ...for a class E felony, there is no need to remit the matter to Supreme Court for resentencing on that count (see People v. McKinney , 91 A.D.3d 1300, 1300, 937 N.Y.S.2d 507 [4th Dept. 2012] ). Instead, in the interest of judicial economy, we further modify the judgment by vacating the senten......
  • People v. Crittenden
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 20 November 2020
    ...maximum legal term of 364 days' incarceration for that crime (see Penal Law § 70.15 [1], [1-a] [b] ; see generally People v. McKinney , 91 A.D.3d 1300, 1300, 937 N.Y.S.2d 507 [4th Dept. 2012] ). Defendant's remaining contentions 136 N.Y.S.3d 646 do not warrant reversal or further modificati......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT