People v. McNair, 144
| Decision Date | 22 October 2009 |
| Docket Number | No. 144,144 |
| Parties | THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RASHAD McNAIR, Appellant. |
| Court | New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
Defendant pleaded guilty to one count of forgery in the second degree in violation of Penal Law § 170.10 (1) relative to his execution of an application to open a joint bank account. On appeal, defendant claims that the trial court erred in accepting his plea because his statements to the court negated the element of intent to defraud. Defendant neither moved to withdraw his plea nor to vacate the judgment of conviction; rather, he sought to challenge the sufficiency of the plea allocution for the first time on direct appeal. In doing so, he seeks to invoke the "narrow exception" to the preservation requirement delineated in People v Lopez (71 NY2d 662 [1988]). That exception applies only "[i]n that rare case . . . where the defendant's recitation of the facts underlying the crime pleaded to clearly casts significant doubt upon the defendant's guilt or otherwise calls into question the voluntariness of the plea," thereby imposing on the trial court "a duty to inquire further to ensure that defendant's guilty plea is knowing and voluntary" (id. at 666 [citations omitted]). When such a situation arises, if the trial court accepts the plea without conducting the required further inquiry, a defendant is entitled to challenge the allocution's sufficiency on direct appeal, even if the defendant fails to make a postjudgment motion (id.).
We agree with defendant that, during the plea allocution, he initially made remarks that "cast significant doubt" on his guilt concerning the element of intent to defraud, thereby triggering the trial court's duty to conduct a further inquiry to ensure that defendant's plea was knowingly and voluntarily made. The plea minutes demonstrate that the trial court properly conducted such an inquiry and found that defendant possessed the necessary criminal intent to defraud. Having failed to move thereafter to withdraw his plea, defendant waived any further challenge to the allocution, and thus no...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Derr v. State
... ... The vast majority of the base pair sequences of human DNA are identical for all people. There are, however, a few DNA segments or genes, called polymorphic loci, which are highly variable among individuals. The alternative forms of ... ...
-
People v. Luck
... ... While an exception to the preservation requirement applies when a defendant's recitation of the facts underlying the crime casts significant doubt on the defendant's guilt, negates an essential element of the crime, or calls into question the voluntariness of the plea (see People v. McNair, 13 N.Y.3d 821, 822, 892 N.Y.S.2d 822, 920 N.E.2d 929 ; People v. Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d 662, 666, 529 N.Y.S.2d 465, 525 N.E.2d 5 ), that is not the case here. In any event, the record as a whole affirmatively demonstrates that the defendant entered her plea of guilty knowingly, voluntarily, and ... ...
-
People v. Deal
... ... Furthermore, the exception to the preservation requirement does not apply here because the defendant's allocution did not cast significant doubt on his guilt, negate an essential element of the crime, or call into question the voluntariness of his plea ( see People v. McNair, 13 N.Y.3d 821, 822, 892 N.Y.S.2d 822, 920 N.E.2d 929;People v. Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d at 666, 529 N.Y.S.2d 465, 525 N.E.2d 5;People v. Soria, 99 A.D.3d at 1027, 952 N.Y.S.2d 300). In any event, a defendant is not entitled to vacatur of his plea of guilty “based on a subsequent unsupported claim of ... ...
-
People v. Mejia
... ... Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d 662, 666, 529 N.Y.S.2d 465, 525 N.E.2d 5; see People v. McNair, 13 N.Y.3d 821, 822, 892 N.Y.S.2d 822, 920 N.E.2d 929; People v. Soria, 99 A.D.3d 1027, 1027, 952 N.Y.S.2d 300; People v. Young, 88 A.D.3d 918, 918, 931 N.Y.S.2d 235). In any event, the record reflects that the plea was knowing, voluntary, and intelligent ( see People v. Seeber, 4 N.Y.3d 780, ... ...