People v. Means
Decision Date | 04 February 1986 |
Citation | 222 Cal.Rptr. 735,177 Cal.App.3d 138 |
Court | California Court of Appeals |
Parties | PEOPLE of the State of California, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Brenda Joyce MEANS, Defendant and Appellant. AO30169. |
John K. Van de Kamp, Atty. Gen., David D. Salmon, Ronald E. Niver, Deputy Attys. Gen., San Francisco, for plaintiff and respondent.
Turner & Beeler, San Ramon, for defendant and appellant.
Defendant Brenda Joyce Means was found guilty by a jury's verdict of arson (Pen.Code, § 451), and filing a fraudulent insurance claim (Ins.Code, § 556, subds. (a)(1)). And she had thereafter admitted, or was found to have suffered, two prior convictions of assault with a deadly weapon. She appeals from a judgment which was entered upon the jury's verdicts.
The first of defendant Means' two appellate contentions follows: "The trial court improperly denied appellant's motion to preclude use of her prior convictions for assault with a deadly weapon for impeachment purposes."
On a so-called Beagle (People v. Beagle, 6 Cal.3d 441, 99 Cal.Rptr. 313, 492 P.2d 1) motion, the trial court ruled that one of defendant's prior felony convictions of assault with a deadly weapon might be used for impeachment, were she to take the witness stand on her own behalf. That ruling is the basis of the instant contention.
The issue is whether such a prior conviction involved "moral turpitude."
The question is answered by People v. Castro (1985) 38 Cal.3d 301, 315, 211 Cal.Rptr. 719, 696 P.2d 111, which announced a rule that a felony indicating its perpetrator's "general readiness to do evil," involves "moral turpitude." Few would agree that an unlawful assault upon a fellow human being with a deadly weapon, indicates other than a "general readiness to do evil."
We find...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
People v. Thomas
...(a)(1)) does necessarily involve moral turpitude. (People v. Valdez (1986) 177 Cal.App.3d 680, 223 Cal.Rptr. 149; People v. Means (1986) 177 Cal.App.3d 138, 222 Cal.Rptr. 735; People v. Armendariz (1985) 174 Cal.App.3d 674, 220 Cal.Rptr. 229; People v. Cavazos, supra, 172 Cal.App.3d 589, 21......
-
People v. Garcia
...specifically, number one, that all three of these crimes involve felonies of moral turpitude. With regards to the 245(c), it's People v. Means, 177 Cal.App.3d 138. Battery on a peace officer is People v. Lindsay, 209 Cal.App.3d 849. The P.C. 69, People v. Williams, 72 Cal.App.4th 1460. [¶] ......
-
People v. Garcia
...specifically, number one, that all three of these crimes involve felonies of moral turpitude. With regards to the 245(c), it's People v. Means, 177 Cal.App.3d 138. Battery on a peace officer is People v. Lindsay, 209 Cal.App.3d 849. The P.C. 69, People v. Williams, 72 Cal.App.4th 1460. [¶] ......
-
People v. Heckathorne
...have so held with nary a dissent on that point. (People v. Valdez (1986) 177 Cal.App.3d 680, 223 Cal.Rptr. 149; People v. Means (1986) 177 Cal.App.3d 138, 222 Cal.Rptr. 735; People v. Armendariz (1985) 174 Cal.App.3d 674, 220 Cal.Rptr. 229; People v. Cavazos (1985) 172 Cal.App.3d 589, 218 C......