People v. Menard
| Citation | 113 A.D.2d 972,493 N.Y.S.2d 643 |
| Parties | The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Charles E. MENARD, Appellant. |
| Decision Date | 12 September 1985 |
| Court | New York Supreme Court Appellate Division |
Thomas J. Snider, Massena, for appellant.
Charles A. Gardner, St. Lawrence County Dist. Atty., Canton, for respondent.
Before KANE, J.P., MIKOLL, YESAWICH, LEVINE and HARVEY, JJ.
Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of St. Lawrence County, rendered July 10, 1984, upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crime of reckless endangerment in the first degree.
Defendant's companion, Donna Cadrette, provided the principal evidence at defendant's trial supportive of the first count of the indictment, a charge of reckless endangerment in the first degree. * Cadrette testified that in the early morning hours of December 25, 1983, after attending a round of parties, she returned to the City of Ogdensburg apartment she shared with defendant. The latter, already there and angry about an incident that had occurred earlier in the evening, pushed Cadrette to the bedroom floor and yelled at her for a period of 15 or 20 minutes. During that time, he was brandishing a shotgun which, according to Cadrette, he discharged once into the bedroom floor but never aimed directly at her. There were also other guns available to defendant in the apartment.
Police officers summoned to the scene testified that, after arresting defendant, they searched the bedroom and found two bullet holes in the wooden floor, two slugs beneath it and two spent 12-gauge shotgun shell casings on the floor. The bullet holes were each located about 1 1/2 feet from Cadrette; the shot adjacent to her head had a trajectory perpendicular to the floor, while the second shot, near her feet, entered at an angle of approximately 45 degrees and traveled away from Cadrette's body. There were no witnesses to the shooting itself other than Cadrette, although one of the officers observed defendant aiming the gun at her as she was lying on the bedroom floor. Defendant's motion to dismiss the indictment for failure to prove a prima facie case was denied and the jury convicted defendant of reckless endangerment in the first degree.
Of defendant's various contentions, only one, that challenging the sufficiency of the evidence, deserves comment. Penal Law § 120.25 provides that a person commits the crime of reckless endangerment in the first degree when "under circumstances evincing a...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People v. Davis
...694, 468 N.Y.S.2d 114). The cases generally require that the weapon be fired, or at a minimum, capable of firing ( see, People v. Menard, 113 A.D.2d 972, 493 N.Y.S.2d 643 People v. Schoonmaker, 103 A.D.2d 936, 479 N.Y.S.2d 765 People v. Graham, 41 A.D.2d 226, 342 N.Y.S.2d 361, supra ). More......
-
People v. Maeweather
..., 14 A.D.3d 887, 889, 787 N.Y.S.2d 742 [2005], lv denied 4 N.Y.3d 853, 797 N.Y.S.2d 427, 830 N.E.2d 326 [2005] ; People v. Menard , 113 A.D.2d 972, 973, 493 N.Y.S.2d 643 [1985], lv denied 68 N.Y.2d 772, 506 N.Y.S.2d 1056, 498 N.E.2d 158 [1986] ; see also People v. Byrd , 79 A.D.3d 1256, 125......
-
People v. Byrd
...risk of death to another person" for purposes of reckless endangerment in the first degree (Penal Law § 120.25; see People v. Menard, 113 A.D.2d 972, 973, 493 N.Y.S.2d 643 [1985], lv. denied 68 N.Y.2d 772, 506 N.Y.S.2d 1056, 498 N.E.2d 158 [1986] ). Further, "close proximity" between the de......
-
People v. Madehere
...Richardson, 97 A.D.2d 693, 694 . The cases generally require that the weapon be fired, or at a minimum, capable of firing (see, People v. Menard, 113 A.D.2d 972 [conviction upheld where slugs found in floor 1 1/2 feet from where complainant had been]; People v. Schoonmaker, 103 A.D.2d 936 [......