People v. Meticheccia
| Decision Date | 05 April 1977 |
| Citation | 91 Misc.2d 129,397 N.Y.S.2d 514 |
| Parties | The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Appellant, v. Anthony J. METICHECCIA, John A. Tisher and Ralph A. Mauro, Defendants-Respondents, and John Manzo, Defendant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court |
Carl A. Vergari, Dist. Atty. (Stephen C. Unsino and Carl F. Lodes, White Plains, of counsel), for appellant.
Joseph S. Ragno, Mount Vernon, for defendants-respondents.
Before FARLEY, P. J., and PITTONI and SILBERMAN, JJ.
Order is unanimously reversed on the law, motion to suppress denied and matter remanded for trial.
Since a pen register does not "intercept communication", its use does not require prior judicial approval (United States v. Auler, 7 Cir., 539 F.2d 642; United States v. Clegg, 5 Cir., 509 F.2d 605; United States v. Baxter, 9 Cir., 492 F.2d 150; Korman v. United States, 7 Cir., 486 F.2d 926; People v. Stewart, 73 Misc.2d 399, 342 N.Y.S.2d 127).
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State v. Brown
...statute); People v. Meticheccia, 83 Misc.2d 241, 371 N.Y.S.2d 805 (N.Y.City Ct.1975), reversed on other grounds, 91 Misc.2d 129, 397 N.Y.S.2d 514 (N.Y.1977) (only those with proprietary interest in telephone have standing to challenge pen register); Commonwealth v. Melilli, 361 Pa.Super. 42......
-
U.S. v. Aiello
...220 (1979); United States v. New York Telephone Co., 434 U.S. 159, 98 S.Ct. 364, 54 L.Ed.2d 376 (1977); People v. Meticheccia, 91 Misc.2d 129, 397 N.Y.S.2d 514 (S.Ct.App.Term 1977). When the wiretap order expired on April 29, 1983, the police, who had not yet applied for an extension order,......
- People v. Bohn