People v. Meyers
| Decision Date | 19 July 1979 |
| Docket Number | No. 79CA0531,79CA0531 |
| Parties | The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas Neil MEYERS, Defendant-Appellant. . I |
| Court | Colorado Court of Appeals |
J. D. MacFarlane, Atty. Gen., J. Stephen Phillips, Asst. Atty. Gen., Denver, for plaintiff-appellee.
Thomas Neil Meyers, pro se.
Defendant appealed a county court judgment to the district court, which affirmed. He then filed this appeal. We dismiss the appeal.
Section 13-6-310(1), C.R.S.1973, provides that a final judgment rendered by a county court shall be reviewed by the district court of the judicial district in which the county is located. Further review of such cases may be had only by petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court. Section 13-6-310(4), C.R.S.1973. Furthermore, cases appealed from a county court to a district court are specifically excluded from the jurisdiction of the Court of Appeals. Section 13-4-102(1)(f), C.R.S.1973.
Where the General Assembly has enacted statutes prescribing appellate procedure, this court may not modify the jurisdiction granted it by statute. Bill Dreiling Motor Co. v. Court of Appeals, 171 Colo. 448, 468 P.2d 37 (1970). Although § 13-4-110(3), C.R.S.1973, provides that cases filed in the wrong appellate court shall not be dismissed, where, as here, appeal will not lie in either court, the only review being by certiorari, the case must be dismissed for failure to comply with the statutory procedure. People ex rel. City of Aurora v. Smith, 162 Colo. 72, 424 P.2d 772 (1967); Industrial Commission v. Plains Utility Co., 127 Colo. 506, 259 P.2d 282 (1953); Trujillo v. Industrial Commission, 31 Colo.App. 297, 501 P.2d 1344 (1972).
Therefore, the appeal is dismissed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People v. Jones
...Educ., 881 P.2d 448, 450–51 (Colo.App.1994), and we cannot “modify the jurisdiction granted [us] by statute.” People v. M e yers, 43 Colo.App. 63, 64, 598 P.2d 526, 527 (1979). ¶ 24 Once the legislature establishes a statutory right of judicial review, “such review must be sought in strict ......
-
People ex rel. L.R.B.
..., 881 P.2d 448, 450-51 (Colo. App. 1994), and we cannot "modify the jurisdiction granted [us] by statute." People v. Meyers , 43 Colo. App. 63, 64, 598 P.2d 526, 527 (1979). ¶ 16 Once the General Assembly establishes a statutory right of judicial review, "such review must be sought in stric......
- Sutliff v. Sutliff
-
Wilson v. Kennedy
...85, ¶ 15, ––– P.3d –––– (quoting Holdridge v. Bd. of Educ. , 881 P.2d 448, 450-51 (Colo. App. 1994) ; accord People v. Meyers , 43 Colo. App. 63, 64, 598 P.2d 526, 527 (1979) ). ¶ 7 Thus, "[a] final judgment is a jurisdictional prerequisite to review on appeal." Brody v. Bock , 897 P.2d 769......
-
Appealable Orders in Family Law
...deadlines for filing post-trial motions and notices of appeal.24 NOTES 1. See C.A.R. 52(b). 2. CRS § 13-6-310(4). See People v. Meyers, 598 P.2d 526 (Colo.App. 1979) (an appeal improperly filed in the Court Appeals must be dismissed; it cannot be transferred to the Supreme Court). 3. See C.......