People v. Midura

Citation864 N.Y.S.2d 109,2008 NY Slip Op 7017,54 A.D.3d 877
Decision Date16 September 2008
Docket NumberNo. 2006-11318,2006-11318
PartiesTHE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JAROSLAW MIDURA, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court Appellate Division

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that he was deprived of his rights to confrontation and to a fair trial when the trial court denied his motion to admit into evidence a complete recording of a telephone call to the 911 police emergency number (hereinafter the recording). This contention is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Dombroff, 44 AD3d 785, 787 [2007]). Moreover, the defendant abandoned this argument because he never renewed his motion to admit the excluded portions of the recording, even though the trial court stated, at the time it denied his motion to admit the entire recording, that it would be willing to "revisit" the issue at a later time (see People v Graves, 85 NY2d 1024, 1027 [1995]; People v Leon-Ramos, 28 AD3d 679, 679-680 [2006]). In any event, even assuming that the recording could be attributed to the complainant, contrary to the defendant's contention, it was not inconsistent with the complainant's trial testimony (see People v Jones, 136 AD2d 740, 741 [1988]).

SANTUCCI, J.P., ANGIOLILLO, ENG and CHAMBERS, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • People v. Flanagan
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 7 Octubre 2015
    ...85 N.Y.2d 1024, 1027, 630 N.Y.S.2d 972, 654 N.E.2d 1220 ; People v. Forte, 70 A.D.3d 963, 964, 897 N.Y.S.2d 133 ; People v. Midura, 54 A.D.3d 877, 864 N.Y.S.2d 109 ). In any event, any error in this regard did not deprive the defendant of a fair trial. There is no merit to the defendant's c......
  • People v. Carrasquillo
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 10 Junio 2011
    ...time specified by the court ( see People v. Graves, 85 N.Y.2d 1024, 1027, 630 N.Y.S.2d 972, 654 N.E.2d 1220; People v. Midura, 54 A.D.3d 877, 864 N.Y.S.2d 109, lv. denied 11 N.Y.3d 856, 872 N.Y.S.2d 79, 900 N.E.2d 562). In any event, we conclude that defendant's contention lacks merit inasm......
  • People v. Diaz
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 2 Febrero 2023
    ...118, 973 N.E.2d 216 [2012] ; see People v. Fleming, 70 N.Y.2d 947, 948, 524 N.Y.S.2d 670, 519 N.E.2d 616 [1988] ; People v. Midura, 54 A.D.3d 877, 877–878, 864 N.Y.S.2d 109 [2d Dept. 2008], lv denied 11 N.Y.3d 856, 872 N.Y.S.2d 79, 900 N.E.2d 562 [2008] ). We reject defendant's further cont......
  • People v. Forte
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 16 Febrero 2010
    ...before it heard from the witness ( see People v. Graves, 85 N.Y.2d 1024, 1027, 630 N.Y.S.2d 972, 654 N.E.2d 1220; People v. Midura, 54 A.D.3d 877, 864 N.Y.S.2d 109; People v. Leon-Ramos, 28 A.D.3d 679, 679-680, 816 N.Y.S.2d 100). In any event, the witness was neither unwilling nor reluctant......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT