People v. Moorer

Decision Date07 July 1980
Citation429 N.Y.S.2d 913,77 A.D.2d 575
PartiesThe PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Cleven MOORER, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Stephen J. Pittari, White Plains (David B. Weisfuse, White Plains, of counsel), for appellant.

Carl A. Vergari, Dist. Atty., White Plains (Richard E. Weill and Gerald D. Reilly, Asst. Dist. Attys., White Plains, of counsel), for respondent.

Before HOPKINS, J. P., and DAMIANI, O'CONNOR and WEINSTEIN, JJ.

MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, rendered July 23, 1979, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the sixth degree, and escape in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial ordered. The facts upon which the judgment is based have been considered and are determined to have been established.

We have examined all of defendant's contentions and find three which entitle him to reversal and a new trial.

In the course of the voir dire examination of prospective jurors, the defendant challenged two for cause. The first, Marcelle Caccioppoli, a high school guidance counselor, stated that she had worked with students who used drugs and she believed the use of cocaine was "inadvisable." The following exchange then occurred:

"MR. WEISFUSE (Defense Counsel): Everyone has developed life experience with a different viewpoint. The point is whether it might affect them or whether they might be partial to one side or another. Really everybody has to make up your (sic ) own individual minds (sic ) now because it's too late after the twelve start. If there is any reservation at any point that you feel that would affect you, you have to decide really definitely now.

"MS. CACCIOPPOLI: I really would have to say in terms of the three counts that were referred to, that I might hold certain views that might influence me.

"MR. WEISFUSE: So you might not be able to be fair and impartial in this case?

"MS. CACCIOPPOLI: I think that might be the case.

"THE COURT: Mr. Weisfuse, let me put this to rest once and for all. I am going to direct this to all twelve jurors who are now being questioned. Do any of you have a state of mind that is likely to preclude you from rendering an impartial verdict based upon the evidence that will be adduced at this trial? Please consider that carefully.

"What are we saying? Do you now have a state of mind which state of mind is likely to prevent you from rendering a verdict that is completely impartial and based solely on the evidence adduced at the trial?

"Do you see the elements of that?

"Is there anyone who feels that way now?

"MS. CACCIOPPOLI: I think, I would have to say, based on my work experience, not my family relationships, that it might cause me to have certain views.

"THE COURT: We all have views.

"MS. CACCIOPPOLI: I realize that. However, I think that there might be certain evidence presented in the case that might be consistent with certain views that I already have that might cause me not to then be able to look as fairly at the situation as I think the defendant deserves, because of my experience with young people, and the daily contacts that I have in working with them.

"THE COURT: So you feel that your present state of mind is one which perhaps may lead you to render a verdict which is other than impartial and not based solely on the evidence?

"MS. CACCIOPPOLI: I think as long as there is a question in my mind, you know, I feel that that should not be there, because of things that might be brought out in the case in relation to other people, because in the indictment you made reference to not just possession for personal use, but other involvement.

"THE COURT: I said the attempt to sell.

"MS. CACCIOPPOLI: Yes, I understand that. You know, I am just trying to explain how I feel, that I might have certain views that might cause me not to look at the situation as impartially as I feel the defendant deserves this situation.

"THE COURT: I am going to define for you, for instance, what intent is in the law. Will you take my law on intent and apply it here, even though you may disagree with it?

"MS. CACCIOPPOLI: Oh, yes. I would certainly defer to you and the law."

The second challenged juror was Louis Tripato. Mr. Tripato advised the court that he had been the victim of "a number of crimes" and that, in the preceding 10 years, his home had been burglarized on some 6 occasions. The court thereupon inquired of him as follows:

"THE COURT: Would that cause you to enter into this case with a preconceived mental attitude which might cause you to be unfair not unfair, but to reach a conclusion based upon this mental attitude rather than upon what you hear from the witnesses and from the documents?

"MR. TRIPATO: I would try not to let it affect me, but I can't say for sure.

"THE COURT: I know you are going to try, but do you think you would be successful?

"MR. TRIPATO: To tell you the truth, I don't know. I don't know whether I would be.

"THE COURT: That is an understandable answer.

"MR. TRIPATO: I can't say definitely right now that I won't. I can't say that I will.

"THE COURT: If I asked you if you could now run the hundred in 9.6, you would probably say very definitely I cannot.

"MR. TRIPATO: Definitely not.

"THE COURT: You would try. On the other hand, if I said can you walk the mile in 30 minutes, you will say I'll try, I don't know. But you see the difference. One is an absolute and the other is a maybe. I take it that at this juncture yours is just a maybe. You will try to be completely and absolutely impartial, but at the present juncture you don't know.

"MR. TRIPATO: Yes.

"THE COURT: Your mental...

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • People v. Harris
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • December 30, 1981
    ...This court has repeatedly issued a similar caution. (See, e.g., People v. Sellers, 73 A.D.2d 697, 423 N.Y.S.2d 222; People v. Moorer, 77 A.D.2d 575, 577, 429 N.Y.S.2d 913.) The same policy has been held applicable to cases involving sworn jurors although, where a challenge is directed at a ......
  • People v. Ivery
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • July 11, 1983
    ...55 N.Y.2d 73, 447 N.Y.S.2d 886, 432 N.E.2d 758; People v. Branch, 46 N.Y.2d 645, 415 N.Y.S.2d 985, 389 N.E.2d 467; People v. Moorer, 77 A.D.2d 575, 429 N.Y.S.2d 913; People v. Sellers, 73 A.D.2d 697, 423 N.Y.S.2d 222). This admonition is equally applicable in cases such as this, involving s......
  • People v. Jackson
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • September 12, 1988
    ...for which prior convictions could be considered is error ( see, People v. Williams, 112 A.D.2d 177, 490 N.Y.S.2d 856; People v. Moorer, 77 A.D.2d 575, 429 N.Y.S.2d 913). With reference to the People's contention that taken individually, these are harmless errors, we note that sufficient har......
  • People v. Cobb, 617
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • July 17, 2020
    ...39 N.Y.S.3d 117, 61 N.E.3d 516 [2016] ; People v. Walton , 51 A.D.3d 1148, 1148, 856 N.Y.S.2d 316 [3d Dept. 2008] ; People v. Moorer , 77 A.D.2d 575, 576, 429 N.Y.S.2d 913 [2d Dept. 1980] ; cf. People v. Collazo , 294 A.D.2d 102, 103, 742 N.Y.S.2d 214 [1st Dept. 2002], lv denied 98 N.Y.2d 7......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Challenges for cause in New York criminal cases.
    • United States
    • Albany Law Review Vol. 64 No. 2, December 2000
    • December 22, 2000
    ...correction officer's comment, the juror at issue stated that she would "`try'" to put her impressions of the defendant aside. Id. (294) 429 N.Y.S.2d 913 (App. Div. 2d Dep't 1980) (295) See id. at 915-16 (encouraging trial judges to "disqualify prospective jurors of questionable impartiality......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT