People v. Morrill

Decision Date17 May 1984
Citation101 A.D.2d 927,475 N.Y.S.2d 648
PartiesThe PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Eddie D. MORRILL, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Thomas P. O'Sullivan, Delanson, for appellant.

Sol Greenberg, Dist. Atty., Albany (Ilene R. Bergman, Albany, of counsel), for respondent.

Before MAHONEY, P.J., and KANE, WEISS, MIKOLL and YESAWICH, JJ.

MEMORANDUM DECISION.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County, rendered March 30, 1982, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree.

While en route to Florida from their home in Arizona, defendant and his girlfriend companion had an argument during a stopover in New York. The girlfriend summoned the police to their motorhome. While there, police arrested defendant and charged him with criminal possession of a weapon. Defendant was subsequently indicted on three counts of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (Penal Law, § 265.02, subd. [4] ) and three counts of criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree (Penal Law, § 265.01, subd. [1] ). Defendant moved to dismiss the indictment on the grounds, inter alia, that the People had impermissibly limited his testimony before the Grand Jury and on constitutional grounds. After the motion was denied, defendant pleaded guilty to the first count of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree in satisfaction of all counts and was sentenced to five years of probation. This appeal by defendant ensued.

Defendant's constitutional challenge to section 265.02 (subd. [4] ) of the Penal Law is without merit. The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution places no limitation on the power of State legislatures to enact gun control legislation (see, e.g., Presser v. Illinois, 116 U.S. 252, 6 S.Ct. 580, 29 L.Ed. 615; People v. Persce, 204 N.Y. 397, 97 N.E. 877). It is also established that the power to regulate weapons is within the police powers of the State (United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542, 23 L.Ed. 588; People v. Persce, supra ). We also reject defendant's argument that section 265.02 of the Penal Law infringes upon the constitutionally protected right to travel. The right to travel is not implicated by restrictions that have no significant impact on interstate travel (see Sklar v. Byrne, 727 F.2d 633; Nowak, Rotunda & Young, Constitutional Law [2d ed], p. 813).

Lastly, defendant's objections...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Peoples Rights Org., Inc. v. Montgomery
    • United States
    • Ohio Court of Appeals
    • April 9, 2001
    ...States v. Johnson (C.A.4, 1974), 497 F.2d 548, 550. See, also, Kellogg v. Gary (Ind.1990), 562 N.E.2d 685, 692; People v. Morrill (1984), 101 A.D.2d 927, 475 N.Y.S.2d 648, 649; In re Atkinson (Minn.1980), 291 N.W.2d 396, 398, fn. 25 Although the Supreme Court has never limited the applicabi......
  • Peoples Rights Organization, Inc. v. Betty D. Montgomery, Ohio Attorney General
    • United States
    • Ohio Court of Appeals
    • April 9, 2001
    ... ... will take over the Brady check program. Please note that for ... people who consent to th [ sic ] waiver, the approval ... time is two days, while non-waivers remain at five days. The ... $13. [ sic ] fee ... Johnson (C.A.4, 1974), 497 F.2d ... 548, 550. See, also, Kellogg v. Gary (Ind.1990), 562 ... N.E.2d 685, 692; People v. Morrill (1984), 101 ... A.D.2d 927, 475 N.Y.S.2d 648, 649; In re Atkinson ... (Minn.1980), 291 N.W.2d 396, 398 n. 1 ... [ 25 ] ... ...
  • Citizens for a Safer Community v. City of Rochester
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • September 16, 1994
    ...States v. Hale, 978 F.2d 1016 [8th Cir.1992], cert. den'd 507 U.S. 997, 113 S.Ct. 1614, 123 L.Ed.2d 174 [1993]; People v. Morrill, 101 A.D.2d 927, 475 N.Y.S.2d 648 [3d Dept.1984]; Moore v. Gallup, 267 A.D. 64, 45 N.Y.S.2d 63 [3d The Second Amendment does, of course, limit the power of Congr......
  • People v. Miller
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • April 12, 2022
    ...our view, New York's licensing requirement remains an acceptable means of regulating the possession of firearms (see People v. Morrill , 101 A.D.2d 927 [475 N.Y.S.2d 648] [1984] ; People v. Ferguson , 21 Misc. 3d 1120[A], 2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 52112 [U] [2008 WL 4694552] [Crim. Ct., Queens Cou......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT