People v. Morris
| Decision Date | 16 August 2017 |
| Docket Number | 2016-10198. Ind. No. 368/15. |
| Citation | 60 N.Y.S.3d 322,153 A.D.3d 729 |
| Parties | The PEOPLE, etc., appellant, v. Anthony MORRIS and Rohan Golding, respondents. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Madeline Singas, District Attorney, Mineola, NY (Donald Berk and W. Thomas Hughes of counsel), for appellant.
Gaitman & Russo, Hempstead, NY (John S. Campo of counsel), for respondent Anthony Morris.
Jay H. Schwitzman, Brooklyn, NY, for respondent Rohan Golding.
REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P., JOHN M. LEVENTHAL, LEONARD B. AUSTIN, and LINDA CHRISTOPHER, JJ.
Appeal by the People from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Carter, J.), dated August 23, 2016, which, after a hearing on that branch of the omnibus motion of the defendant Anthony Morris which was to suppress physical evidence and pursuant to a stipulation in lieu of motions of the defendant Rohan Golding, granted suppression of physical evidence.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed.
On January 14, 2015, just before 9:30 p.m., two police officers responded to a report of a shooting involving a white Infiniti SUV with several occupants, including one female. Approximately 15 minutes later and eight or nine blocks away from the location of the reported shooting, the officers observed an SUV matching that description parked in a strip mall parking lot, and a woman standing next to it. As the officers approached in their vehicle, the woman walked away, and the driver of the SUV began to drive away. The officers pulled the SUV over, exited their vehicle, and approached the SUV on foot, one officer on each side of it. The officers observed that the two male occupants, the defendants herein, were leaning toward each other, and each had an elbow on the SUV's center console. The officers did not observe any contraband or firearms inside the SUV. The driver complied with the officers' request to provide his license and registration, following which the defendants were removed from the SUV, frisked, handcuffed, and seated on a nearby curb to wait for eyewitnesses to the shooting to arrive. Additional officers arrived, one of whom approached the SUV and, noticing that the center console was slightly elevated, opened it and found a handgun. The defendantswere then arrested. The eyewitnesses subsequently arrived and confirmed that the defendants were not the persons who had committed the shooting. A second handgun was later found in the center console.
"[A]bsent probable cause, it is unlawful for a police officer to invade the interior of a stopped vehicle once the suspects have been removed and patted down without incident, as any immediate threat to the officers' safety has consequently been...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People v. Marcial
...contained evidence of the burglaries (see People v. Vargas, 89 A.D.3d at 771–772, 931 N.Y.S.2d 683 ; see also People v. Morris, 153 A.D.3d 729, 729–730, 60 N.Y.S.3d 322 ). Moreover, given the passage of a full day's time since the most recent burglaries described in the I-card, and two full......
-
People v. Dessasau
...door of the minivan, and the weapon found as a result of the unlawful search should have been suppressed (see People v. Morris, 153 A.D.3d 729, 729–730, 60 N.Y.S.3d 322 ; People v. Baksh, 113 A.D.3d at 628–630, 977 N.Y.S.2d 407 ).Without the weapon, there could not be sufficient evidence to......
- People v. McMahon