People v. Morrison

Decision Date19 August 1985
Docket NumberNos. 82-0984,82-1038 and 82-1086,s. 82-0984
Parties, 91 Ill.Dec. 770 PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carmichael MORRISON, a/k/a James Ivory, Tommie Newton and Edward Stokes, Defendants-Appellants.
CourtUnited States Appellate Court of Illinois

Richard M. Daley, Chicago (Michael E. Shabat, Jeanette Sublett, Karen C. Wirth, Chicago, of counsel), for plaintiff-appellee.

Richard E. Gorman, Chicago, for defendant-appellant, Carmichael Morrison.

James J. Doherty, Chicago (Thomas P. Marnell, Aaron L. Meyers, Chicago, of counsel), for defendant-appellant, Edward Stokes.

Steven Clark, Bruce Mosbacher, Chicago (Thomas P. Marnell, Chicago, of counsel), for defendant-appellant Tommie Newton.

CAMPBELL, Justice:

Following a joint jury trial, defendants Carmichael Morrison, Tommie Newton and Edward Stokes, each represented by separate counsel, were convicted of seven counts of home invasion and six counts of attempt armed robbery. (Ill.Rev.Stat.1981, ch. 38, pars. 12-11 and 8-4, respectively.) Morrison was sentenced to concurrent extended terms of 50 years for home invasion and 25 years for attempt armed robbery; Newton was sentenced to concurrent terms of 14 years for each offense; and Stokes was sentenced to concurrent terms of 22 years for home invasion and 14 years for attempt armed robbery. On appeal, defendants, individually or jointly, contend that: (1) they were erroneously charged, convicted and sentenced on multiple counts of home invasion and attempt armed robbery (2) the conviction and sentence for attempt armed robbery must be vacated as a lesser included offense of home invasion; (3) the trial court erred in reading defendant Morrison's aliases to the jury prior to voir dire and in permitting the State to refer to the aliases at trial; (4) the State failed to prove all of the elements of home invasion beyond a reasonable doubt; (5) they were prejudiced by the State's withholding of evidence favorable to defendants; (6) the State's offer to stipulate to police reports at trial severely prejudiced the defense; (7) they were denied effective assistance of counsel; (8) the trial court erred in failing to hold an evidentiary hearing on defendant's motion for a new trial; (9) the trial court improperly tried and sentenced defendant Newton in absentia; (10) the State's improper remarks during closing argument substantially prejudiced defendants; (11) the trial court's erroneous oral jury instructions for both offenses constituted reversible error; and (12) the trial court erred in sentencing defendant Morrison to extended term sentences. For the reasons stated herein, we affirm in part, vacate in part and remand for resentencing as to all defendants on the offense of home invasion.

The charges against defendants stem from an incident which occurred at approximately 11 p.m. on October 23, 1981, at the apartment of Delvey, Arnearry, Tyronne and Felisia Smith, located in Chicago. According to the State's evidence, the Smiths, Maria Morris, Rocky Hunter and Milton Lee were present in the Smiths' third-floor apartment when defendant Newton buzzed the apartment's intercom and asked for Delvey Smith. Delvey told his brother, Tyronne, to "buzz" Newton into the building and then he left the apartment to meet her on the third-floor landing so as to avoid a confrontation between Newton and Maria Morris, Delvey's fiancee. When Delvey met Newton on the third-floor landing, he saw defendant Morrison coming up the stairs with a gun aimed at him. Defendant Stokes, also armed, followed immediately behind Morrison. Stokes swung at Delvey with his gun but missed him because Delvey knelt down and covered his head with his hands. While Delvey was in this position, one of the three defendants searched his pockets and took $300 in cash. At gunpoint, defendants ordered Delvey to knock on his apartment door. Rocky Hunter opened the door and defendants rushed in, shouting "Police," and pushing Delvey into the living room with the others.

In the living room, Stokes held Tyronne, Arnearry, Delvey, Rocky Hunter and Milton Lee at gunpoint and ordered them to remove their jewelry and put it on the glass top coffee table. Meanwhile, Morrison and Newton walked to the back of the apartment where Felisia Smith was washing dishes and ordered her to join the others in the living room and to remove her jewelry. When Hunter removed his watch and dropped it onto the table, it caused a loud noise which momentarily distracted Stokes. At that instant, Arnearry jumped Stokes who reacted by firing his gun twice in the direction of the couch. No one was hit. Morrison heard the commotion in the living room and came around the corner, aiming his gun in the general direction of the victims. Tyronne then jumped up and grabbed Morrison's wrists, wrestled him to the ground and managed to take possession of the gun. Once disarmed, Morrison attempted to leave the apartment, but was followed down the building stairs into the vestibule by Tyronne where the fight continued.

Felisia Smith had entered the living room area just as Arnearry leaped toward Stokes. In the resulting confusion, she ran out of the apartment to her boyfriend's house.

Prior to the struggle over the guns, Maria Morris, who had been in the bathroom at the time defendants entered the apartment, had opened the bathroom door when she heard voices and was confronted by Morrison, pointing a gun in her face. He told her to stay in the bathroom. Shortly thereafter, Newton opened the bathroom door and told Maria to get out and go into the living room with the others. As Maria was walking toward the living room, she heard two shots, and ran out of the apartment toward Felisia's boyfriend's house.

Officer Michael Grymes of the Chicago Police Department testified that on the night in question, he and his partner responded to a radio message of a man with guns on South Essex in Chicago. When they arrived on the scene, Grymes observed Tyronne Smith and Morrison in the apartment vestibule. Tyronne was holding a gun and Morrison was on the floor. Grymes also observed two men struggling in the window of a third-floor apartment in the same building. Grymes and his partner entered the vestibule with guns drawn and told Tyronne to drop the gun. Tyronne handed him the gun and told Grymes that he was not the "one," but that Morrison had been trying to rob him. Meanwhile, Chicago police officers McGavock and Williams arrived and proceeded to the third-floor apartment.

Officer McGavock testified that on October 23, 1981, while responding to a radio message of a woman calling for help, he and his partner saw Felisia Smith running eastbound in the 7700 block of Kingston, apparently in a hysterical state, wearing a bathrobe and no shoes. The officers followed Felisia to a nearby apartment where they talked to her, then proceeded to 7707 S. Essex where they saw Maria Morris standing in the street. When Officer McGavock and his partner entered the building, they observed two males in the building vestibule with Officer Grymes and his partner. McGavock then proceeded to the Smiths' third-floor apartment where he saw Delvey Smith and Stokes struggling in the living room near the front window. Stokes was holding a gun and Delvey was holding Stokes' wrist. McGavock took the gun from Stokes and made a protective pat down search.

In contradiction to the State's evidence, defendant Stokes testified that on October 23, 1981, he, Newton, and Morrison went to Delvey Smith's apartment to purchase cocaine. When Delvey opened the lobby door of the apartment, Stokes informed him that they had a diamond cluster ring and $450 in cash with which to make the drug purchase. Defendants and Delvey then proceeded upstairs to the Smiths' apartment to complete the transaction. Milton Lee, Rocky Hunter, Arnearry and Tyronne Smith were in the Smiths' apartment at the time.

While Stokes was sitting in the living room, he heard Delvey and Morrison arguing about the payment in another room. When they began to "tussle" with each other, Milton Lee and Arnearry jumped up and ran into the other room. Stokes attempted to leave the apartment, but Arnearry struck him on the head with a gun. Stokes then grabbed for the gun and began struggling with three or four people, all of whom were trying to force him to release the gun. Stokes denied hearing any gunshots during the struggle and further denied that either he or the other defendants were armed with guns when they entered the Smiths' apartment.

On the third day of trial, following the testimony of the State's first witness, the court excused the jury and admonished defendant Newton, who was the only defendant out on bond, that if she failed to appear for court at any time, she would be tried and sentenced in absentia. Newton acknowledged that she understood the court's admonishment. When trial resumed on the fourth day, defendant Newton was present. At the conclusion of that day's proceedings, the court informed all those present, including defendant Newton, that trial would resume the following day (Friday) at 11 a.m. When defendant Newton failed to appear by noon the next day, and her counsel was unable to contact her, the court excused the jury for lunch and discussed with all counsel the procedure for proceeding with trial in absentia. The court also informed counsel for Newton that if Newton did not appear when trial resumed following lunch recess, he would advise the jury that the trial would commence on the following Monday in absentia. All counsel indicated that they understood the procedure. When defendant Newton failed to appear following lunch recess, the court admonished the jury as to the provisions of the Criminal Code regarding the willful absence of a defendant at trial and continued the proceedings to 9:30 a.m. on the following Monday. When defendant...

To continue reading

Request your trial
58 cases
  • People v. Gonzalez, 1-88-0904
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • November 6, 1992
    ...the defendant's attorney. (People v. Lyles (1985), 106 Ill.2d 373, 391, 87 Ill.Dec. 934, 478 N.E.2d 291.) In People v. Morrison (1985), 137 Ill.App.3d 171, 91 Ill.Dec. 770, 484 N.E.2d 329 the defendants claimed that they were denied a fair trial because of numerous improper and prejudicial ......
  • People v. Wheeler
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • July 19, 1991
    ... ...         The defendant next argues that the prosecutor "attacked the veracity of some of defendant's alibi witnesses and chastised trial defense counsel for orchestrating a false alibi." A prosecutor may comment on the credibility of defense witnesses (People v. Morrison (1985), 137 Ill.App.3d 171, 91 Ill.Dec. 770, 484 N.E.2d 329), and merely questioning the validity and believability of defendant's alibi is not improper (People v. Mitchell (1990), 200 Ill.App.3d 969, 146 Ill.Dec. 596, 558 N.E.2d 559). We have examined the comments cited by the defendant and we ... ...
  • People v. Cole
    • United States
    • Illinois Supreme Court
    • March 28, 1996
    ... ... McDarrah, 175 Ill.App.3d 284, 124 Ill.Dec ... Page 1283 ... [216 Ill.Dec. 726] 827, 529 N.E.2d 808 (1988); People v. Parker, 166 Ill.App.3d 123, 116 Ill.Dec. 635, 519 N.E.2d 703 (1988); People v. Yarbrough, 156 Ill.App.3d 643, 109 Ill.Dec. 86, 509 N.E.2d 747 (1987); People v. Morrison, 137 Ill.App.3d 171, 177-78, 91 Ill.Dec. 770, 484 N.E.2d 329 (1985); People v. Ammons, [172 Ill.2d 102] 120 Ill.App.3d 855, 76 Ill.Dec. 377, 458 N.E.2d 1031 (1983). The rationale for this view is found in the legislature's description of the elements of the offense: the home invasion statute ... ...
  • People v. Pryor
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • March 22, 2007
    ... ... Our courts have long construed similar language in the robbery statute (720 ILCS 5/18-1(a) (West 2002)) as allowing a separate count for each victim. See, e.g., Butler, 64 Ill.2d at 488-89, 1 Ill.Dec. 204, 356 N.E.2d 330; People v. Morrison, 137 Ill.App.3d 171, 178, 91 Ill.Dec. 770, 484 N.E.2d 329 (1985). Section 2-3 of the Code clearly defines "another" as a person or persons other than the offender. 720 ILCS 5/2-3 (West 2002). Section 18-3 of the Code provides that a person commits vehicular hijacking when he or she takes a motor ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT