People v. Muse

Decision Date06 November 1961
Docket NumberCr. 7701
PartiesPEOPLE of the State of California, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Josie Mae MUSE, Defendant and Appellant.
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeals Court of Appeals

Walter L. Gordon, Jr., Los Angeles, for appellant.

Stanley Mosk, Atty. Gen., William E. James, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Norman H. Sokolow, Deputy Atty. Gen., for respondent.

WOOD, Presiding Justice.

Defendant was convicted, in a nonjury trial, of assault with a deadly weapon. Probation was denied and she was sentenced to imprisonment in the county jail for 180 days. She appeals from the judgment.

Appellant contends that there 'was ample unrebutted evidence of the defense of self defense'; and that there was ample evidence of 'the defense of prevention of a felony,' namely, the prevention of false imprisonment.

John Jimerson and the appellant had been friends five or six years, and occasionally they stayed at night in his hotel room. She kept some of her clothes in his room, and she had stayed in his room the night before the incident involved herein.

In the evening of November 20, 1960, they, Ruth Austin (Jimerson's sister), and Moses McDaniel (Ruth's friend) were in Jimerson's room. At that time an argument started between Jimerson and appellant. Jimerson testified that he did not know how the argument started, but he did remember that he told her to go home and that she said she would not go; the appellant removed a knife from a sheath (which was hanging on a bookcase) and said she was not going any place; Jimerson asked her to close the door; she said she would not close it; he said he would close it; when he started to close the door she stabbed him with the knife; he was stabbed 'just below the abdomen.' The knife blade was 6 inches long. As a result of the stabbing, two surgical operations were performed on him and he was in a hospital about eight weeks.

He also testified that he wanted the door closed because he did not want the noise of the argument to disturb the other tenants; he did not have anything in his hand when he was stabbed; he did not strike appellant that evening; on prior occasions he had struck her with his hand but not with his fist; he asked her to go home because he wanted to avoid an argument.

Officer Benell testified that he arrived at Jimerson's room about 8:40 p. m. on said day; two other officers, who arrived there previously, had possession of the knife and sheath; later that evening, he (witness) had a conversation with appellant, in the presence of Officer Keil, wherein appellant said that every time she and Jimerson had an argument he was always right and she was wrong, and she 'was tired of this and she had stabbed him once and she didn't care if she hung for it'; she said the reason she did not cut him more was that he would not 'fight back'; when the witness (officer) asked her what caused the argument, she did not reply.

Appellant testified in substance, as follows: On said November 20, about 2 p. m., while she and Jimerson were in his room, Ruth Austin and Moses McDaniel came there. All of them played cards until 5 p. m. when, at Ruth's request, the appellant took her, in Jimerson's automobile, to a lodge meeting. After leaving Ruth at the meeting, appellant went to her (appellant's) home and got some clothes for the next day. She intended to stay at Jimerson's room that night. She returned to his room and played cards with him and McDaniel about an hour. Then she went to the lodge and brought Ruth to Jimerson's room. The two men had been drinking. The four persons played cards about 45 minutes, and Jimerson seemed to be getting 'higher.' Appellant said she did not want to play cards....

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • People v. Kellersberger
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • December 3, 2013
    ..."the testimony of one witness is sufficient proof of the crime if he is believed by the trier of the facts." (People v. Muse (1961) 196 Cal.App.2d 662, 664.) The record is reviewed in the light most favorable to the judgment. (People v. Jones (2013) 57 Cal.4th 899, 960; People v. Johnson (1......
  • People v. Chavez
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • December 20, 1968
    ...is sufficient without corroboration to sustain a conviction. (People v. Sanders, 206 Cal.App.2d 479, 23 Cal.Rptr. 725; People v. Muse, 196 Cal.App.2d 662, 16 Cal.Rptr. 768.) Furthermore, the trial judge in determining credibility of witnesses was free to reject defendant's claim of self-def......
  • People v. Roberts
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • November 29, 1967
    ...officers must be deemed substantial evidence. (See People v. Sanders, 206 Cal.App.2d 479, 482, 23 Cal.Rptr. 725; People v. Muse, 196 Cal.App.2d 662, 664, 16 Cal.Rptr. 768.) Their credibility was for the jury to determine. (See People v. Barbera, 50 Cal.2d 688, 692, 328 P.2d 973; People v. W......
  • People v. Pulido, F050833 (Cal. App. 12/5/2007)
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • December 5, 2007
    ...in resisting an unlawful arrest by a private citizen or attempting to free himself from the hold of the citizen. And in People v. Muse (1961) 196 Cal.App.2d 662, defendant unsuccessfully raised self-defense and the defense of prevention of a felony, specifically the crime of false imprisonm......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT