People v. Nibbs
Decision Date | 01 July 1960 |
Citation | 206 N.Y.S.2d 17 |
Parties | PEOPLE of the State of New York v. Jacob NIBBS and another, Defendants. |
Court | New York Court of General Sessions |
Frank S. Hogan, Dist. Atty., New York City (by Howard A. Jones, New York City, of counsel), for People.
Harry H. Mogel, New York City, for defendant.
Because the indictment, which charges felonious possession of a narcotic drug with intent to sell, felonious possession of a narcotic drug, and criminally possessing a pistol, indicates by the symbol 'IB' (a True Bill of the 'Indictment Bureau') that defendant did not have a preliminary hearing in the magistrates' court (People v. Florence, 146 Misc. 735, 262 N.Y.S. 775), I grant item No. '1' of this motion for a bill of particulars to the extent of having the district attorney furnish defendant Nibbs with the approximate times of day or night when, and the approximate places or locations where, the crimes alleged took place. In all other respects, this motion is denied. See also People v. Brodsky, 15 Misc.2d 594, 183 N.Y.S.2d 57, and cases cited therein.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
People v. Ricci
...approximate times of day or night when, and the approximate places or locations where, the crimes alleged took place.' People v. Nibbs (1960) Gen.Sess., 206 N.Y.S.2d 17. Items a(2) and b(2). Denied. The statute defines a sale as 'to sell, exchange, give or dispose of to another, or to offer......