People v. Nolan

Decision Date19 November 2015
PartiesThe PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Shaylen M. NOLAN, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Richard V. Manning, Parishville, for appellant.

Andrew J. Wylie, District Attorney, Plattsburgh (Ashley M. Monette, Law Intern), for respondent.

Opinion

PETERS, P.J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Clinton County (Ryan, J.), rendered November 7, 2013, which revoked defendant's probation and imposed a sentence of imprisonment.

In July 2012, defendant waived indictment and agreed to be prosecuted by a superior court information charging her with criminal nuisance in the first degree stemming from allegations that she allowed heroin to be sold from her apartment in exchange for free drugs and rent money. Defendant pleaded guilty as charged with the understanding that, if she were accepted into and successfully completed the Clinton County Drug Court program, she would be placed on probation for five years with a period of community service and she would be obligated to cooperate and provide truthful testimony against certain codefendants. Defendant was thereafter accepted into the drug court program. In May 2013, upon completion of, among other things, certain inpatient and intensive outpatient treatment, and, based on the availability of a supportive living program in Albany County, County Court agreed to administratively discharge defendant from the drug court program and sentenced her to a period of five years of probation and 100 hours of community service and imposed the requisite $375 in associated fines and surcharges.1Four months later, defendant was returned to County Court on a bench warrant for a violation of probation stemming from, among other things, her discharge from the supportive living program. In November 2013, defendant admitted to violating her probation and County Court revoked her probation and resentenced her to a prison term of 1 ? to 4 years. Defendant appeals.

We affirm. To the extent that defendant contends that County Court erred in resentencing her without an updated presentence investigation report, such claim is unpreserved for our review inasmuch as defendant failed to request an updated report, raise an objection during resentencing or move to vacate the resentence (see People v. Dorfeuille,127 A.D.3d 1414, 1414–1415, 7 N.Y.S.3d 642 [2015], lv. denied26 N.Y.3d 928, 17 N.Y.S.3d 91, 38 N.E.3d 837 [2015]; People v. Alexander,110 A.D.3d 1111, 1111, 972 N.Y.S.2d 353 [2014]...

To continue reading

Request your trial
13 cases
  • People v. Goldman
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • May 5, 2016
    ...outside the record and are more properly the subject of a postconviction motion pursuant to CPL article 440 (see People v. Garry, 133 A.D.3d at 1040, 19 N.Y.S.3d 192 ; People v. Clapper, 133 A.D.3d 1037, 1038, 20 N.Y.S.3d 452 [2015] ).30 N.Y.S.3d 760 Finally, insofar as defendant contends t......
  • People v. Gueye
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • December 9, 2021
    ...196 A.D.3d 973, 973, 148 N.Y.S.3d 405 [2021], lv denied 37 N.Y.3d 1059, 154 N.Y.S.3d 629, 176 N.E.3d 665 [2021] ; People v. Nolan, 133 A.D.3d 1040, 1041, 19 N.Y.S.3d 195 [2015] ; People v. Crowell, 119 A.D.3d 1163, 1164, 989 N.Y.S.2d 397 [2014], lv denied 24 N.Y.3d 1083, 1 N.Y.S.3d 9, 25 N.......
  • People v. Gueye
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • December 9, 2021
    ...him is unpreserved for our review (see People v Bullett, 196 A.D.3d 973, 973 [2021], lv denied 37 N.Y.3d 1059 [2021]; People v Nolan, 133 A.D.3d 1040, 1041 [2015]; People v Crowell, 119 A.D.3d 1163, 1164 [2014], lv denied 24 N.Y.3d 1083 [2014]). Garry, P.J., Aarons, Pritzker and Colangelo, ......
  • People v. Gueye
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • December 9, 2021
    ...him is unpreserved for our review (see People v Bullett, 196 A.D.3d 973, 973 [2021], lv denied 37 N.Y.3d 1059 [2021]; People v Nolan, 133 A.D.3d 1040, 1041 [2015]; People v Crowell, 119 A.D.3d 1163, 1164 [2014], lv denied 24 N.Y.3d 1083 [2014]). Garry, P.J., Aarons, Pritzker and Colangelo, ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT