People v. Oliver, 2003-02612.

Decision Date13 June 2005
Docket Number2003-02612.
Citation2005 NY Slip Op 05102,19 A.D.3d 512,797 N.Y.S.2d 116
PartiesTHE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LEONARD OLIVER, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Testimony regarding the defendant's membership in a gang was properly admitted since such evidence was relevant to motive and intent, and explained the sequence of events and the relationship between the defendant and the codefendant, and the complainants (see People v Newby, 291 AD2d 460 [2002]; People v Herrera, 287 AD2d 579 [2001]; People v Pacheco, 265 AD2d 347 [1999]). Its probative value outweighed its potential prejudice, and the trial court alleviated any prejudice to the defendant by sustaining his objections and providing appropriate curative instructions to the jury (see People v Newby, supra; People v Cham, 259 AD2d 492 [1999]). To the extent that any alleged inappropriate remark remained unaddressed, it was harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of the defendant's guilt (see People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230 [1975]; People v Bernard, 224 AD2d 192 [1996]).

Florio, J.P., Adams, Mastro and Lifson, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
14 cases
  • People v. Argueta
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • May 12, 2021
    ...32 N.Y.3d 70, 83, 85 N.Y.S.3d 377, 110 N.E.3d 489 ; People v. Mansilla, 187 A.D.3d 794, 796, 130 N.Y.S.3d 91 ; People v. Oliver, 19 A.D.3d 512, 512–513, 797 N.Y.S.2d 116 ), and the prejudicial effect of that testimony did not outweigh its probative value (see People v. Sarkodie, 172 A.D.3d ......
  • People v. Barrow
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • February 13, 2013
    ...not have been able to describe the encounter ( see People v. Dianda, 70 N.Y.2d 894, 524 N.Y.S.2d 381, 519 N.E.2d 292;People v. Lopez, 19 A.D.3d at 512, 798 N.Y.S.2d 473;cf. People v. Kitching, 78 N.Y.2d 532, 538, 577 N.Y.S.2d 231, 583 N.E.2d 944). The defendant's remaining contentions are w......
  • People v. Dunbar
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • June 22, 2010
    ...the relationship between the defendant and the complainant ( see People v. Ramirez, 23 A.D.3d 500, 805 N.Y.S.2d 617; People v. Oliver, 19 A.D.3d 512, 797 N.Y.S.2d 116). The prosecutor's summation remarks concerning the prior shooting constituted fair comment on the evidence or fell within t......
  • People v. Smalls
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • December 14, 2016
    ...; People v. Bruno, 127 A.D.3d 986, 986, 7 N.Y.S.3d 408 ; People v. Green, 92 A.D.3d 953, 954–956, 939 N.Y.S.2d 520 ; People v. Oliver, 19 A.D.3d 512, 512, 797 N.Y.S.2d 116 ; People v. Malik, 265 A.D.2d 577, 578, 697 N.Y.S.2d 156 ). Contrary to the defendant's contention, reversal is not war......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT