People v. Oliver, 63282
Decision Date | 29 August 1979 |
Docket Number | No. 63282,63282 |
Parties | PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daniel OLIVER, Defendant-Appellant. 407 Mich. 857, 283 N.W.2d 502 |
Court | Michigan Supreme Court |
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the Court of Appeals, 90 Mich. App. 144, 282 N.W.2d 262, is considered, and, pursuant to GCR 1963, 853.2(4), in lieu of leave to appeal, we REVERSE the defendant's convictions of delivery of phencyclidine (M.C.L. § 335.341(1)(b); M.S.A. § 18.1070(41)(1)(b)) and delivery of marijuana (M.C.L. § 335.341(1)(c); M.S.A. § 18.1070(41)(1)(c)) and REMAND the case to the Calhoun Circuit Court for new trial. People v. Baldwin and People v. Woolfolk, 405 Mich. 550, 275 N.W.2d 253 (1979).
To continue reading
Request your trial-
People v. Woods
...fact that the trial courts on the record improperly weighed similarity as a factor favoring admissibility. See e.g., People v. Oliver, 407 Mich. 857, 283 N.W.2d 502 (1979), rev'g 90 Mich.App. 144, 282 N.W.2d 262 (1979); People v. Cash, 406 Mich. 930, 277 N.W.2d 334 (1979), rev'g 80 Mich.App......
-
People v. Missouri
...Mich.App. at 399, 213 N.W.2d 314, People v. Oliver, 90 Mich.App. 144, 146-147, 282 N.W.2d 262 (1979), rev'd on other grounds 407 Mich. 857, 283 N.W.2d 502 (1979). Here, there is no question concerning the authenticity or identity of the substance because the purported narcotics were never o......
-
People v. Smith
...a defendant's right to counsel. See People v. Oliver, 90 Mich.App. 144, 149-150, 282 N.W.2d 262 (1979), rev'd on other grounds 407 Mich. 857, 283 N.W.2d 502 (1979) (resentencing required where the trial court obtains information about defendant which is not equally available to defendant's ......
-
People v. Johnson
...would have used its discretion had it properly weighed the similarity of the offenses. The Supreme Court summarily reversed in 407 Mich. 857, 283 N.W.2d 502 (1979). While we fail to find an affirmative misapplication of the relevant criteria on the record in this case, we nonetheless conclu......