People v. Ortiz, 1337

Decision Date21 December 2018
Docket Number1337,KA 15–02050
Citation90 N.Y.S.3d 793,167 A.D.3d 1562
Parties The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Anthony S. ORTIZ, Defendant–Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

167 A.D.3d 1562
90 N.Y.S.3d 793

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent,
v.
Anthony S. ORTIZ, Defendant–Appellant.

1337
KA 15–02050

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Entered: December 21, 2018


EASTON THOMPSON KASPEREK SHIFFRIN LLP, ROCHESTER (BRIAN SHIFFRIN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT–APPELLANT.

SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (NANCY GILLIGAN OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, CARNI, AND TROUTMAN, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

167 A.D.3d 1563

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him following a jury trial of murder in the second degree ( Penal Law § 125.25[1] ), assault in the second degree (§ 120.05[2] ), and two counts of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (§ 265.03[1][b]; [3] ), defendant contends that he was deprived of effective assistance of counsel because defense counsel failed to ask County Court to instruct the jury on a justification defense and objected to the prosecutor's request that the jury be charged with manslaughter in the first degree (§ 125.20[1] ) as a lesser included offense of murder in the second degree. We reject that contention.

"[I]t is incumbent on defendant to demonstrate the absence of strategic or other legitimate explanations" for defense counsel's allegedly deficient conduct ( People v. Rivera, 71 N.Y.2d 705, 709, 530 N.Y.S.2d 52, 525 N.E.2d 698 [1988] ; see People v. Benevento, 91 N.Y.2d 708, 712, 674 N.Y.S.2d 629, 697 N.E.2d 584 [1998] ), and defendant failed to meet that burden here (see People v. Hicks, 110 A.D.3d 1488, 1489, 972 N.Y.S.2d 800 [4th Dept. 2013], lv denied 22 N.Y.3d 1156, 984 N.Y.S.2d 640, 7 N.E.3d 1128 [2014] ). Although there was a reasonable view of the evidence that defendant was justified in shooting one of the victims, who was chasing defendant as he fled a violent brawl, defense counsel...

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • People v. Richardson
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • July 31, 2019
    ...to advance the misidentification defense was consistent with strategic decisions of a reasonably competent attorney" ( People v. Ortiz, 167 A.D.3d 1562, 1563, 90 N.Y.S.3d 793 [4th Dept. 2018], lv denied 33 N.Y.3d 979, 101 N.Y.S.3d 235, 124 N.E.3d 724 [2019] [internal quotation marks omitted......
  • People v. Wesley B.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • December 21, 2018

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT