People v. Osorio-Rivera

Decision Date13 December 2017
Docket NumberS.C.I. No. 15–00216,2015–08172
Citation64 N.Y.S.3d 913 (Mem),156 A.D.3d 728
Parties The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Edgardo OSORIO–RIVERA, appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Brendan O'Meara, White Plains, NY, for appellant.

Anthony A. Scarpino, Jr., District Attorney, White Plains, N.Y. (Raffaelina Gianfrancesco of counsel), for respondent (no brief filed).

MARK C. DILLON, J.P., SANDRA L. SGROI, JOSEPH J. MALTESE, BETSY BARROS, LINDA CHRISTOPHER, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Capeci, J.), rendered July 13, 2015, convicting him of assault in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v. California(386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 ), in which he moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the defendant.

ORDERED that the motion of Brendan O'Meara for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted, and he is directed to turn over all papers in his possession to new counsel assigned herein; and it is further,

ORDERED that Marshall Goldstein, Esq., 399 Knollwood Road, Suite 211, White Plains, NY, 10603, is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal; and it is further,

ORDERED that the respondent is directed to furnish a copy of the certified transcript of the proceedings to the appellant's new assigned counsel; and it is further,

ORDERED that new counsel shall serve and file a brief on behalf of the appellant within 90 days of the date of this decision and order on motion and the respondent shall serve and file its brief within 30 days after the brief on behalf of the appellant is served and filed. By prior decision and order on motion of this Court dated April 20, 2016, the appellant was granted leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person, with the appeal to be heard on the original papers, including a certified transcript of the proceedings, and on the briefs of the parties, who were directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other.

The brief submitted by the appellant's counsel pursuant to Anders v. California(386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 ) is deficient because it fails to contain an adequate statement of facts and fails to analyze any potential appellate issues or highlight facts in the record that might arguably support the appeal (see People v. McNair, 110 A.D.3d 742, 971 N.Y.S.2d 889 ; People v. Singleton, 101 A.D.3d 909, 910, 954 N.Y.S.2d 910 ; ...

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • People v. Cales, 2016–03686
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • December 13, 2017
    ...A.D.3d 71564 N.Y.S.3d 913 (Mem)The PEOPLE, etc., respondent,v.Jose CALES, also known as Jason Ortiz, also known as Jason Cales, appellant.2016–03686S.C.I. No. 161/16Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.Submitted November 15, 2017December 13, 2017Seymour W. James, J......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT