People v. Pearson, Docket No. 6848

• Decision Date: 01 June 1970
• Docket Number: Docket No. 6848,No. 3,3
• Citation: 24 Mich.App. 270,180 N.W.2d 53
• Parties: PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Eric Emanuel PEARSON, Defendant-Appellant
• Court: Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US

Page 53

180 N.W.2d 53

24 Mich.App. 270

PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Eric Emanuel PEARSON, Defendant-Appellant.

Docket No. 6848.

Court of Appeals of Michigan, Division No. 3.

June 1, 1970.

Released for Publication Oct. 14, 1970.

Bernard E. Larson, Ironwood, for defendant-appellant.

Frank J. Kelley, Atty. Gen., Robert A. Derengoski, Sol. Gen., Jerome C. Nadolney, Pros. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before FITZGERALD, P.J., and J. H. GILLIS and O'HARA, ^* JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was charged with first degree murder, M.C.L.A. § 750.316 (Stat.Ann.1954 Rev. § 28.548). He pled guilty to an open charge of murder and the court took testimony to determine the degree of homicide. The facts indicate that defendant had been drinking, he put his rifle into his car, drove 5 or 6 miles to a tavern, walked in, shot and killed one Rudolph Maurin. The gun was taken from defendant by customers and during the scuffle, he was hit over the head with a whiskey bottle by one of the patrons. Defendant was apprehended at the scene. The trial judge concluded that defendant was guilty of murder in the first degree and sentenced him to life imprisonment.

On appeal, defendant presents three issues: (1) Was defendant so under the influence of liquor at the time of the commission of the crime that he did not have the mental capacity necessary for a conviction of first degree murder? (2) Do the facts warrant a conviction of first degree murder? and (3) Did the trial court exceed its authority at the degree hearing by eliciting facts rather than have the prosecuting attorney do so?

A complete review of the transcript of the plea examination discloses that the court committed no error in accepting the guilty plea. Defense counsel was present. There were no objections to the acceptance of the plea, nor was the question of intoxication interposed. In the absence of manifest injustice, we do not consider objections raised for the first time on appeal. People v. Willis (1965), 1 Mich.App. 428, 136 N.W.2d 723; People v. Bradford (1968), 10 Mich.App. 696, 160 N.W.2d 373. A plea of guilty is itself a conviction. Like a jury verdict it is conclusive. People v. Collins (1968), 380 Mich. 131, 156 N.W.2d 566.

The evidence of defendant's guilt is overwhelming. At the degree hearing, witnesses, including a doctor, testified that defendant was alert and in possession of his faculties, able to walk, climbed stairs without falling, staggering or lurching. The trial judge found that defendant understood the events surrounding the death of the victim and that the killing was wilful, deliberate and premeditated. The record supports this conclusion. There is no indication of any miscarriage of justice. People v. Thomas (1967), 7 Mich.App. 519, 152 N.W.2d 166; People v. Gill (1968), 12 Mich.App. 383, 163 N.W.2d 14.

It is for the court to determine the degree of...