People v. Pedraza

Decision Date08 October 1985
Citation66 N.Y.2d 626,485 N.E.2d 237,495 N.Y.S.2d 30
Parties, 485 N.E.2d 237 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Armando PEDRAZA, Appellant.
CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals

Jonathan H. Oberman and William E. Hellerstein, New York City, for appellant.

Mario Merola, Dist. Atty. (Michael J. Eng and Billie Manning, New York City of counsel), for respondent.

Prior report: 107 A.D.2d 572, 483 N.Y.S.2d 699 (1985).

Order affirmed. It is clear from this record that the sentencing court did consider "the nature and circumstances of the crime and * * * the history and character of the defendant" (Penal Law sec. 70.02), correctly including whether, in view of defendant's physical condition, a sentence of imprisonment would be "unduly harsh". Thus, it cannot be said that the court failed to exercise its discretion or abused that discretion as a matter of law.

WACHTLER, C.J., and JASEN, MEYER, SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER and TITONE, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • People v. Tweedy
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • 16 Noviembre 1987
    ...the salient sentencing factors, and we perceive no error in the imposition of the challenged sentences (see, People v. Pedraza, 66 N.Y.2d 626, 495 N.Y.S.2d 30, 485 N.E.2d 237; People v. Farrar, 52 N.Y.2d 302, 437 N.Y.S.2d 961, 419 N.E.2d 864; People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d ...
  • People v. Charron
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • 24 Noviembre 1993
    ...circumstances of defendant, a first-time offender, and the serious nature of the crimes committed (see, People v. Pedraza, 66 N.Y.2d 626, 627, 495 N.Y.S.2d 30, 485 N.E.2d 237). We note that defendant was found guilty of three distinct criminal acts for which he could have been sentenced to ......
  • People v. Forgione
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • 23 Noviembre 1987
    ...the challenged sentence falls within both the statutory boundaries and the court's broad discretion (see e.g., People v. Pedraza, 66 N.Y.2d 626, 495 N.Y.S.2d 30, 485 N.E.2d 237; People v. Farrar, 52 N.Y.2d 302, 437 N.Y.S.2d 961, 419 N.E.2d 864; People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d W......
  • People v. Morin
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • 15 Abril 1993
    ...the trial court must consider the individual circumstances of both the defendant and the crime (see, People v. Pedraza, 66 N.Y.2d 626, 627, 495 N.Y.S.2d 30, 485 N.E.2d 237). In view of defendant's negligible criminal record, which consists of one misdemeanor conviction almost 20 years ago, ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT