People v. Pena
| Decision Date | 10 June 1997 |
| Citation | 658 N.Y.S.2d 593,240 A.D.2d 206 |
| Parties | The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Chris PENA, Defendant-Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
David M. Cohn, for respondent.
Susan Epstein, for defendant-appellant.
Before WALLACH, J.P., and NARDELLI, RUBIN, TOM and ANDRIAS, JJ.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Renee White, J.), rendered October 18, 1994, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 4 1/2 to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.
The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Issues concerning credibility of witnesses and reliability of identification were properly presented to the jury and we see no reason to disturb its findings (People v. Gaimari, 176 N.Y. 84, 94, 68 N.E. 112).
The court properly closed the courtroom during the testimony of the undercover officers, who, at the Hinton hearing, stated that they continued to work undercover in the exact location where defendant was arrested, that defendant's cohort was never apprehended and might still be in the area, that they had been threatened by drug dealers in the past, that they had ongoing investigations, that they had taken precautionary measures not to be identified as police officers when in the court building, and that they feared for their safety if the courtroom remained open (see, People v. Martinez, 82 N.Y.2d 436, 604 N.Y.S.2d 932, 624 N.E.2d 1027; see, People v. Lugo, 233 A.D.2d 197, 650 N.Y.S.2d 102). Furthermore, the court was not required, sua sponte, to consider alternatives to closure (see, People v. Ford, 235 A.D.2d 285, 654 N.Y.S.2d 2), and the court's findings supporting closure were more than adequate.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Ayala v. Speckard
...People v. Cruz, 659 N.Y.S.2d 741 (1st Dep't 1997) (mem.); People v. Yung, 659 N.Y.S.2d 733 (1st Dep't 1997) (mem.); People v. Pena, 658 N.Y.S.2d 593 (1st Dep't 1997); People v. Ballesteros, 658 N.Y.S.2d 594 (1st Dep't 1997); People v. Gatling, 658 N.Y.S.2d 304 (1st Dep't 1997); People v. Wa......
- Armata v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London - Syndicate 1861
-
People v. Allah
...continuing operations and the location of the arrest (see, People v. Armond, --- A.D.2d ----, 672 N.Y.S.2d 726; People v. Pena, 240 A.D.2d 206, 658 N.Y.S.2d 593). The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Issues of credibility were ......
-
People v. Pena
...576 668 N.Y.S.2d 576 91 N.Y.2d 878, 691 N.E.2d 648 People v. Chris Pena Court of Appeals of New York Dec 01, 1997 Levine, J. --- A.D.2d ----, 658 N.Y.S.2d 593 App.Div. 1, New York Denied. ...