People v. Perez
| Decision Date | 13 May 2008 |
| Docket Number | 2007-04002. |
| Parties | THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. EDUARDO PEREZ, Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
By pleading guilty, the defendant forfeited his right to review of his claim that he was deprived of a speedy trial under CPL 30.30 (see People v O'Brien, 56 NY2d 1009, 1010 [1982]). Moreover, the defendant could not validly reserve his right to obtain appellate review of his statutory speedy trial claim by obtaining, when he entered his plea, the consent of the prosecutor and the approval of the court (see People v O'Brien, 56 NY2d at 1010; People v Douglas, 46 AD3d 698 [2007]).
To continue reading
Request your trial
3 cases
-
People v. Kidd
...U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215) and his statutory speedy trial claim were forfeited by his plea of guilty (see People v. Perez, 51 A.D.3d 824, 856 N.Y.S.2d 862;People v. Philips, 30 A.D.3d 621, 817 N.Y.S.2d 373). The defendant's remaining contention in his pro se supplemental brief ......
-
People v. Cameron
...of youthful offender treatment was a provident exercise of the Supreme Court's discretion ( seeCPL 720.20[1]; People v. Meriwether, 51 A.D.3d at 824, 859 N.Y.S.2d 208;People v. Kinloch, 7 A.D.3d 734, 735, 777 N.Y.S.2d 185;People v. Gonzalez, 265 A.D.2d 216, 696 N.Y.S.2d 152).SKELOS, J.P., A......
-
People v. Allen
...plea [was] entered" ( People v. O'Brien, 56 N.Y.2d 1009, 1010, 453 N.Y.S.2d 638, 439 N.E.2d 354 [1982] ; see People v. Perez, 51 A.D.3d 824, 824, 856 N.Y.S.2d 862 [2d Dept. 2008], lv denied 11 N.Y.3d 740, 864 N.Y.S.2d 398, 894 N.E.2d 662 [2008] ).It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so ap......