People v. Perez

Decision Date29 December 1975
Citation50 A.D.2d 908,377 N.Y.S.2d 564
PartiesThe PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Roberto PEREZ, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

William E. Hellerstein and William J. Gallagher, New York City (Elliot Schnapp, New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

Eugene Gold, Dist. Atty., Brooklyn (Helman R. Brook, Brooklyn, of counsel), for respondent.

Before LATHAM, Acting P.J., and COHALAN, MARGETT, BRENNAN and MUNDER, JJ.

MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered March 15, 1974, upon resentence, convicting him of criminally selling a dangerous drug in the third degree and criminal possession of a dangerous drug in the fourth and sixth degrees, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

The failure of the People to produce the memo book of the undercover cover police officer who purchased the heroin from defendant was sufficiently explained so as to remove any suggestion of bad faith on the part of the prosecution. It was therefore not error to require the defense to continue cross-examination of the officer without the memo book (cf. People v. Conroy, 34 N.Y.2d 917, 919, 359 N.Y.S.2d 551, 316 N.E.2d 868; United States v. Bryant, 142 U.S.App.D.C. 132, 439 F.2d 642, 651--652).

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • People v. McClam
    • United States
    • New York District Court
    • March 30, 2015
    ...a simple traffic infraction' (citation omitted)." People v. Chestnut, 43 AD2d 260, 351 N.Y.S.2d 26, 28 (3rd Dept. 1974) aff'd 36 NY2d 971, 377 N.Y.S.2d 564 (1975) See also: People v. Virges, 118 AD3d 1445, 987 N.Y.S.2d783 (4th Dept. 2014) ["When the police officer smelled marihuana, he had ......
  • People v. Hampton
    • United States
    • New York City Court
    • August 16, 1983
    ...disclosure of material evidence place upon the government a "correlative duty to preserve such material evidence". See People v. Perez, 50 A.D.2d 908, 377 N.Y.S.2d 564 (Second Dept.1975); People v. McCann, 115 Misc.2d 1025, 1028, 455 N.Y.S.2d 212 (Sup.Ct., Queens Co., 1982); People v. Santi......
  • People v. Shepherd
    • United States
    • New York Town Court
    • March 25, 1983
    ...178, 445 N.Y.S.2d 601 (2d Dept.1981); People v. Watkins, 67 A.D.2d 741, 742, 412 N.Y.S.2d 235 (3d Dept.1979); People v. Perez, 50 A.D.2d 908, 377 N.Y.S.2d 564 (2d Dept.1975). Furthermore, this duty holds regardless of whether the material is clearly exculpatory or simply may have been. Brya......
  • People v. Jones
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • May 22, 1987
    ...the content of the memorandum and the specifics of the information received by McArdle from the informant (see, People v. Perez, 50 A.D.2d 908, 377 N.Y.S.2d 564). Also without merit is defendant's claim that the search of his duffle bag was unconstitutional. The record amply supports the de......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT