People v. Perez
Decision Date | 29 December 1975 |
Citation | 50 A.D.2d 908,377 N.Y.S.2d 564 |
Parties | The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Roberto PEREZ, Appellant. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
William E. Hellerstein and William J. Gallagher, New York City (Elliot Schnapp, New York City, of counsel), for appellant.
Eugene Gold, Dist. Atty., Brooklyn (Helman R. Brook, Brooklyn, of counsel), for respondent.
Before LATHAM, Acting P.J., and COHALAN, MARGETT, BRENNAN and MUNDER, JJ.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered March 15, 1974, upon resentence, convicting him of criminally selling a dangerous drug in the third degree and criminal possession of a dangerous drug in the fourth and sixth degrees, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Judgment affirmed.
The failure of the People to produce the memo book of the undercover cover police officer who purchased the heroin from defendant was sufficiently explained so as to remove any suggestion of bad faith on the part of the prosecution. It was therefore not error to require the defense to continue cross-examination of the officer without the memo book (cf. People v. Conroy, 34 N.Y.2d 917, 919, 359 N.Y.S.2d 551, 316 N.E.2d 868; United States v. Bryant, 142 U.S.App.D.C. 132, 439 F.2d 642, 651--652).
To continue reading
Request your trial-
People v. McClam
...a simple traffic infraction' (citation omitted)." People v. Chestnut, 43 AD2d 260, 351 N.Y.S.2d 26, 28 (3rd Dept. 1974) aff'd 36 NY2d 971, 377 N.Y.S.2d 564 (1975) See also: People v. Virges, 118 AD3d 1445, 987 N.Y.S.2d783 (4th Dept. 2014) ["When the police officer smelled marihuana, he had ......
-
People v. Hampton
...disclosure of material evidence place upon the government a "correlative duty to preserve such material evidence". See People v. Perez, 50 A.D.2d 908, 377 N.Y.S.2d 564 (Second Dept.1975); People v. McCann, 115 Misc.2d 1025, 1028, 455 N.Y.S.2d 212 (Sup.Ct., Queens Co., 1982); People v. Santi......
-
People v. Shepherd
...178, 445 N.Y.S.2d 601 (2d Dept.1981); People v. Watkins, 67 A.D.2d 741, 742, 412 N.Y.S.2d 235 (3d Dept.1979); People v. Perez, 50 A.D.2d 908, 377 N.Y.S.2d 564 (2d Dept.1975). Furthermore, this duty holds regardless of whether the material is clearly exculpatory or simply may have been. Brya......
-
People v. Jones
...the content of the memorandum and the specifics of the information received by McArdle from the informant (see, People v. Perez, 50 A.D.2d 908, 377 N.Y.S.2d 564). Also without merit is defendant's claim that the search of his duffle bag was unconstitutional. The record amply supports the de......