People v. Powell

Decision Date16 March 1999
CitationPeople v. Powell, 690 N.Y.S.2d 826, 179 Misc.2d 1047 (N.Y. App. Term 1999)
Parties, 1999 N.Y. Slip Op. 99,208 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Appellant, v. Devin POWELL, Respondent. . Second Department
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Term

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney of Kings County, Brooklyn (Roseann B. MacKechnie and Leonard Joblove of counsel), for appellant.

Legal Aid Society, New York City (M. Sue Wycoff, Daniel L. Greenberg and Sara Bennett of counsel), for respondent.

PRESENT: KASSOFF, P.J., CHETTA and PATTERSON, JJ.

MEMORANDUM.

Order unanimously reversed on the law, accusatory instrument reinstated and matter remanded to the court below for all further proceedings.

The People in the case at bar announced their readiness on the 91st day after commencement of the action as the 90th day fell on a Sunday (see, CPL 30.30[b]; 1.20 ). The court, in dismissing the accusatory instrument, held that the provisions of General Construction Law § 25-a(1) are not applicable to CPL 30.30. Section 25-a(1) of the General Construction Law provides that it is applicable when any period of time ends on a Saturday, Sunday or holiday. The General Construction Law should be read into every statute subsequently enacted, unless the wording of said statute plainly expresses a contrary intent (see, 97 N.Y.Jur.2d, Statutes § 99). Since CPL 30.30 does not express a contrary intent, the provisions of said section of the General Construction Law are applicable and the People's time to announce their readiness was extended to the next...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
23 cases
  • People v. Lewis
    • United States
    • New York Criminal Court
    • October 24, 2019
    ...on that day. The Appellate Term, Second Department, explicitly applied Section 25-a(1) to C.P.L. § 30.30 in People v. Powell , 179 Misc.2d 1047, 690 N.Y.S.2d 826 (2d Dept. 1999) and this Court is bound by that decision. Observing that "[t]he General Construction Law should be read into ever......
  • People v. Mandela
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • July 7, 2016
    ...period established under CPL 30.30(1)(b) for defendants charged with certain misdemeanors (see People v. Powell, 179 Misc.2d 1047, 1048, 690 N.Y.S.2d 826 [App.Term, 2d Dept.1999], lv. denied 93 N.Y.2d 928, 693 N.Y.S.2d 511, 715 N.E.2d 514 [1999] ). Under principles broadly applicable to the......
  • People v. Figueroa
    • United States
    • New York Criminal Court
    • September 7, 2022
    ...12, 2021. However, because that day was a Saturday, the 90th day fell on the following Monday. ( People v. Powell , 179 Misc. 2d 1047, 1048, 690 N.Y.S.2d 826 [Sup. Ct., App. Term 2d Dep't 1999] ; People v. Mandela , 142 A.D.3d 81, 85-86, 36 N.Y.S.3d 248 [3d Dep't 2016] ). On that Monday, th......
  • Singleton v. Lee
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of New York
    • March 13, 2012
    ...subsequently enacted, unless the wording of said statute plainly expresses a contrary intent[.]" People v. Powell, 179 Misc.2d 1047, 1048, 690 N.Y.S.2d 826, 827 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1999) (citation omitted). C.P.L. § 460.10 does not contain wording expressing an intent tat the General Constructio......
  • Get Started for Free