People v. Prashad, 2006-00872.

Decision Date18 December 2007
Docket Number2006-00872.
Citation46 A.D.3d 844,2007 NY Slip Op 10183,848 N.Y.S.2d 279
PartiesTHE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. SAMUEL PRASHAD, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, he was not denied a fair trial when the court permitted the prosecutor to question him regarding his failure to provide police officers with certain exculpatory information at the time of arrest. Generally, a defendant's postarrest silence cannot be used for impeachment purposes (see People v Conyers, 52 NY2d 454, 459 [1981]). However, where, as here, a defendant speaks to the police and omits exculpatory information which he presents for the first time at trial, the defendant may be impeached with the omission (see People v Savage, 50 NY2d 673, 676, 679 [1980], cert denied 449 US 1016 [1980]; People v Blacks, 221 AD2d 351 [1995]; People v Spinelli, 214 AD2d 135, 139-141 [1995]; People v West, 212 AD2d 651, 652 [1995]; People v Harrison, 149 AD2d 434, 434-435 [1989]).

The defendant's remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, is without merit.

Miller, J.P., Crane, Dillon and Balkin, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • People v. Tucker
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • September 20, 2011
    ...v. Savage, 50 N.Y.2d at 678–679, 431 N.Y.S.2d 382, 409 N.E.2d 858; People v. Fox, 60 A.D.3d at 967, 876 N.Y.S.2d 98; People v. Prashad, 46 A.D.3d 844, 848 N.Y.S.2d 279; People v. Blacks, 221 A.D.2d 351, 633 N.Y.S.2d 793), here, as the People correctly concede, the defendant expressly invoke......
  • People v. Johnson
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • March 12, 2020
    ...which he [or she] presents for the first time at trial, the defendant may be impeached with the omission" ( People v. Prashad, 46 A.D.3d 844, 844, 848 N.Y.S.2d 279 [2007], lv denied 10 N.Y.3d 815, 857 N.Y.S.2d 48, 886 N.E.2d 813 [2008] ; see 183 A.D.3d 90 People v. Savage, 50 N.Y.2d 673, 67......
  • People v. Jean
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • June 25, 2014
    ...People v. Savage, 50 N.Y.2d 673, 676, 431 N.Y.S.2d 382, 409 N.E.2d 858;People v. Fox, 60 A.D.3d 966, 876 N.Y.S.2d 98;People v. Prashad, 46 A.D.3d 844, 848 N.Y.S.2d 279;People v. Davis, 256 A.D.2d 173, 683 N.Y.S.2d 496;People v. Spinelli, 214 A.D.2d 135, 631 N.Y.S.2d 863). The summation comm......
  • People v. Prashad
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals
    • March 28, 2008
    ...815 857 N.Y.S.2d 48 PEOPLE v. PRASHAD. Court of Appeals of the State of New York. March 28, 2008. Appeal from the 2d Dept.: 46 A.D.3d 844, 848 N.Y.S.2d 279 Application for leave to criminal appeal Denied. (Read, J.) ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT