People v. Ramos, 2004-04178.

Citation803 N.Y.S.2d 918,23 A.D.3d 501,2005 NY Slip Op 08755
Decision Date14 November 2005
Docket Number2004-04178.
PartiesTHE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. EDWARD RAMOS, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant's assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]).

Adams, J.P., Ritter, Goldstein, Skelos and Dillon, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • People v. Lazaro
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • February 25, 2015
  • People v. Borrero
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • December 7, 2010
    ...the Supreme Court alleviated any prejudice to the defendant by providing appropriate limiting instructions ( see People v. Ramirez, 23 A.D.3d at 501, 805 N.Y.S.2d 617; People v. Newby, 291 A.D.2d at 460, 738 N.Y.S.2d 355). Under the circumstances, any error in admitting opinion testimony fr......
  • People v. Ramirez
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • November 14, 2005

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT