People v. Ramos, 2004-04178.
Citation | 803 N.Y.S.2d 918,23 A.D.3d 501,2005 NY Slip Op 08755 |
Decision Date | 14 November 2005 |
Docket Number | 2004-04178. |
Parties | THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. EDWARD RAMOS, Appellant. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant's assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]).
To continue reading
Request your trial3 cases
- People v. Lazaro
-
People v. Borrero
...the Supreme Court alleviated any prejudice to the defendant by providing appropriate limiting instructions ( see People v. Ramirez, 23 A.D.3d at 501, 805 N.Y.S.2d 617; People v. Newby, 291 A.D.2d at 460, 738 N.Y.S.2d 355). Under the circumstances, any error in admitting opinion testimony fr......
- People v. Ramirez