People v. Ramos

CourtNew York Court of Appeals
Citation8 N.Y.3d 926,866 N.E.2d 463
Decision Date05 March 2007
PartiesPEOPLE v. RAMOS (OMAR).
866 N.E.2d 463
8 N.Y.3d 926
PEOPLE
v.
RAMOS (OMAR).
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
March 5, 2007.

Appeal from 1st Dept.: 35 A.D.3d 268, 824 N.Y.S.2d 901 (Bronx).


Application for leave to criminal appeal. Denied. (Graffeo, J.).

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 practice notes
  • People v. Romanowski, 2021-04321
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (New York)
    • July 9, 2021
    ...seek to proceed pro se (People v LaValle, 3 N.Y.3d 88, 106 [2004]; see People v Ramos, 35 A.D.3d 247, 247 [1st Dept 2006], lv denied 8 N.Y.3d 926 [2007]). Rather, defendant merely noted the existence of his right to represent himself. Noting the existence of a right is not equivalent to inv......
  • People v. Romanowski, 1147
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • July 9, 2021
    ...88, 106, 783 N.Y.S.2d 485, 817 N.E.2d 341 [2004] ; see People v. Ramos , 35 A.D.3d 247, 247, 825 N.Y.S.2d 222 [1st Dept. 2006], lv denied 8 N.Y.3d 926, 834 N.Y.S.2d 516, 866 N.E.2d 462 [2007] ). Rather, defendant merely noted the existence of his right to represent himself. Noting the exist......
2 cases
  • People v. Romanowski, 2021-04321
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (New York)
    • July 9, 2021
    ...seek to proceed pro se (People v LaValle, 3 N.Y.3d 88, 106 [2004]; see People v Ramos, 35 A.D.3d 247, 247 [1st Dept 2006], lv denied 8 N.Y.3d 926 [2007]). Rather, defendant merely noted the existence of his right to represent himself. Noting the existence of a right is not equivalent to inv......
  • People v. Romanowski, 1147
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • July 9, 2021
    ...88, 106, 783 N.Y.S.2d 485, 817 N.E.2d 341 [2004] ; see People v. Ramos , 35 A.D.3d 247, 247, 825 N.Y.S.2d 222 [1st Dept. 2006], lv denied 8 N.Y.3d 926, 834 N.Y.S.2d 516, 866 N.E.2d 462 [2007] ). Rather, defendant merely noted the existence of his right to represent himself. Noting the exist......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT