People v. Reyes
| Decision Date | 13 January 1986 |
| Citation | 116 A.D.2d 602,497 N.Y.S.2d 463 |
| Parties | The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Ricardo REYES, Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Honey Bernstein, Warwick, for appellant.
Carl A. Vergari, Dist. Atty., White Plains (Melinda Tell Lazare and Anthony J. Servino, of counsel), for respondent.
Before GIBBONS, J.P., and THOMPSON, BROWN and EIBER, JJ.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Rosato, J.), rendered May 8, 1984, convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree (two counts), after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.
Judgment affirmed.
A review of the record indicates that the People disproved the defense of justification beyond a reasonable doubt (see, People v. Reed, 40 N.Y.2d 204, 386 N.Y.S.2d 371, 352 N.E.2d 558). Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620, 467 N.Y.S.2d 349, 454 N.E.2d 932), the record establishes that following the first confrontation between the parties, defendant retreated to his apartment and the decedent did not follow him. Thereafter, defendant returned to the scene of the prior incident carrying a baseball bat and a knife. Even assuming at this point that defendant reasonably believed that the decedent was about to use deadly force against him, he was obligated to withdraw from the encounter rather than use deadly force himself since he had the ability to retreat in complete safety (see, People v. Mungin, 106 A.D.2d 519, 483 N.Y.S.2d 54; People v. Young, 99 A.D.2d 791, 471 N.Y.S.2d 888). Instead, defendant chose to remain and resort to more than necessary force to allegedly defend himself, and this second altercation resulted in the stabbing death of the decedent. On these facts, the defense of justification was not available to defendant (see, Penal Law § 35.15[2] ).
Defendant claims that the Trial Judge's consideration of evidence regarding alleged threats made by defendant's brother to a prosecution witness precluded the Judge from conducting a fair and impartial trial. This assertion is without merit. A judge is deemed uniquely capable of distinguishing those issues properly presented to him from those not, and is presumed, absent a showing of prejudice, to have considered only the competent evidence adduced at trial in reaching the verdict (see, People v. Lombardi, 76 A.D.2d 891, 428...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Davis v. Strack
...120, 543 N.E.2d 763 (1989), habeas corpus dismissed, 92 CV 2136, 1995 WL 264170 (E.D.N.Y. April 26, 1995); People v. Reyes, 116 A.D.2d 602, 602-03, 497 N.Y.S.2d 463, 464-65 (2d Dep't) (justification charge not available where "following the first confrontation between the parties, defendant......
-
People v. Smith
...a reasonable doubt where defendant had the only gun which he claimed deceased tried to grab during struggle]; People v. Reyes, 116 A.D.2d 602, 497 N.Y.S.2d 463 (2d Dept.1986), lv. denied 67 N.Y.2d 949, 502 N.Y.S.2d 1042, 494 N.E.2d 127 (1986) [justification considered at bench trial but dis......
-
Y.K., Matter of
...use of excessive physical force under the circumstances (see generally, People v. King, supra; People v. Varela, supra; People v. Reyes, 116 A.D.2d 602, 497 N.Y.S.2d 463). Since the record amply supports the Family Court's determination that the appellant used deadly physical force against ......
-
People v. Ya-ko Chi
...577; People v. Walker, 175 A.D.2d 146, 147, 572 N.Y.S.2d 36; People v. Sims, 127 A.D.2d 805, 806, 511 N.Y.S.2d 935;People v. Reyes, 116 A.D.2d 602, 603, 497 N.Y.S.2d 463), here, this presumption was rebutted when further testimony on the subject was permitted and elicited by the trial court......