People v. Richardson

Decision Date01 November 1983
Citation468 N.Y.S.2d 114,97 A.D.2d 693
PartiesThe PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Charles RICHARDSON, Defendant-Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

R.L. Stavis, Little Neck, for respondent.

D.E. Rosen, for defendant-appellant.

Before KUPFERMAN, J.P., and SANDLER, ASCH and LYNCH, JJ.

MEMORANDUM DECISION.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Bronx County, convicting defendant after trial by jury, of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and reckless endangerment in the first degree and sentencing him as a second felony offender to concurrent indeterminate terms of imprisonment of from 6 to 12 years on the weapons charge and 3 1/2 to 7 years for the reckless endangerment, is modified, on the law and facts, to the extent of reversing the conviction for reckless endangerment in the first degree, dismissing that count of the indictment, vacating the sentence in its entirety and remanding for resentencing on the remaining count and, as so modified, otherwise affirmed.

John Wiggers testified at trial that on October 25, 1979, after he finished working at St. Luke's Hospital, he went to a social club at 800 East 160th Street in the Bronx where, as a second job, he cleaned up the premises each night after the club closed. When he arrived at 1:00 A.M., appellant, who he had known on a first but not last name basis for several years, and five other patrons of the club, two of whom he knew by their nicknames, were standing outside. As Wiggers unlocked the door, appellant and the others shoved him inside and told him they wanted to play cards. Appellant said: "I'll give you some money to play cards," but Wiggers told them that he was not allowed to let them stay; that he had to clean up; and that he needed the job and the extra money. He was able to coax the men to go outside with him and then he turned and locked the door from the outside. As he turned away from the door, he was talking to one of the men named Sam, when appellant, who was standing eight feet away, fired a pistol in the air and then pointed it at Mr. Wiggers and said: "This one is for you." Wiggers said nothing and slowly started walking away down the block, at which point he heard the group all laugh at him. He flagged down a patrol car and he and the police returned to the club, but by then everyone had left. They drove to appellant's home. When the appellant arrived there, Mr. Wiggers identified him and he was arrested by the police. The police frisked appellant and found a revolver in his right pants pocket. The revolver contained five live rounds and one empty chamber.

Appellant did not testify at trial, but witnesses for the defense, who were present at the time of the incident, did testify that no shots were fired and that appellant and Mr. Wiggers did not argue that evening.

Penal Law § 120.25 provides that "[a] person is guilty of reckless endangerment in the first degree when, under circumstances evincing a depraved indifference to human life, he...

To continue reading

Request your trial
20 cases
  • People v. Davis
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • June 9, 1988
    ...to support a reckless endangerment conviction and there are decisions holding that it does not ( see, e.g., People v. Richardson, 97 A.D.2d 693, 694, 468 N.Y.S.2d 114). The cases generally require that the weapon be fired, or at a minimum, capable of firing ( see, People v. Menard, 113 A.D.......
  • U.S. v. Legros, Docket No. 05-2828-cr.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • June 17, 2008
    ...(shooting pistol into the air does not constitute reckless endangerment in the first degree) (citing People v. Richardson, 97 A.D.2d 693, 694, 468 N.Y.S.2d 114, 115 (1st Dep't 1983)). Shooting a gun into the air in a residential area is of course risky. But nothing in the record indicates t......
  • Osborne v. Cnty. of Seneca
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of New York
    • June 6, 2014
    ...of moving police van provided probable cause to arrest for Reckless Endangerment in Second Degree); People v. Richardson, 97 A.D.2d 693, 694, 468 N.Y.S.2d 114, 115 (1st Dept. 1983) (Finding that pointing a loaded gun at someone and threatening to shoot is sufficient to establish the crime o......
  • State v. Buford, No. E2004-01780-CCA-R3-CD (TN 6/23/2005)
    • United States
    • Tennessee Supreme Court
    • June 23, 2005
    ...a gun, standing alone, is not sufficient to constitute [the] commission of reckless endangerment. See People v. Richardson, 97 A.D.2d 693, 468 N.Y.S.2d 114 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1983) (holding discharge of gun into air does not constitute reckless Fox, 947 S.W.2d at 865-66. The defenda......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT