People v. Rivera

Citation767 N.Y.S.2d 881,2 A.D.3d 542,2003 NY Slip Op 19330
Decision Date08 December 2003
Docket Number2001-05145.
PartiesTHE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JULIO RIVERA, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court Appellate Division

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the trial court properly refused to instruct the jury with respect to manslaughter in the first and second degrees as lesser-included offenses of intentional murder (see CPL 300.50; People v Butler, 84 NY2d 627 [1994]). Under no reasonable view of the evidence could the jury have found that the defendant committed the lesser offenses but not the greater, given the number of shots fired by the defendant at close range into the victim's vital organs as the victim tried to escape (see People v Butler, supra; People v Evans, 192 AD2d 671 [1993]; People v Rielly, 190 AD2d 695 [1993]). The defendant's claim that he was intoxicated and therefore was entitled to a charge of manslaughter in the second degree as a lesser-included offense of intentional murder is improperly raised for the first time on appeal (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10, 25 [1995]; People v Johnston, 166 AD2d 667 [1990]). In any event, the evidence, viewed most favorably to the defendant, did not support the defendant's contention that his alcohol consumption affected his mental capacity to commit intentional murder (see People v Butler, supra at 632-633; cf. People v Gaines, 83 NY2d 925, 926 [1994]; People v Rodriguez, 76 NY2d 918, 920-921 [1990]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Smith, J.P., McGinity, Luciano and Townes, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • People v. Bey
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • 30 d2 Março d2 2010
    ...the defendant committed the lesser offense but not the greater ( see People v. Alexis, 65 A.D.3d 1160, 885 N.Y.S.2d 340; People v. Rivera, 2 A.D.3d 542, 767 N.Y.S.2d 881; People v. Collins, 290 A.D.2d 457, 458, 736 N.Y.S.2d 109). The defendant's contention that the prosecutor violated the u......
  • People v. Greene
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • 2 d2 Agosto d2 2011
    ...the defendant committed the lesser offense but not the greater ( see People v. Bey, 71 A.D.3d at 1156, 898 N.Y.S.2d 189; People v. Rivera, 2 A.D.3d 542, 543, 767 N.Y.S.2d 881; People v. Jackson, 202 A.D.2d 518, 519, 609 N.Y.S.2d 65). The trial court's response to the jury's note asking for ......
  • People v. Rivera
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • 12 d4 Novembro d4 2015
    ...on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated December 8, 2003 (People v. Rivera, 2 A.D.3d 542, 767 N.Y.S.2d 881 ), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered June 4, 2001.ORDERED that the application is denied.......
  • People v. Rivera
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • 12 d4 Novembro d4 2015
    ...on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated December 8, 2003 (People v. Rivera, 2 A.D.3d 542, 767 N.Y.S.2d 881), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered June 4, 2001. ORDERED that the application is denied.......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT