People v. Rivera
| Decision Date | 08 April 1999 |
| Citation | 93 N.Y.2d 901,689 N.Y.S.2d 714 |
| Parties | , 711 N.E.2d 990 People v. Rivera |
| Court | New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
To continue reading
Request your trial
7 cases
-
People v. Harris
... ... denied 8 N.Y.3d 925, 834 N.Y.S.2d 515, 866 N.E.2d 461 [2007] ; People v. Garcia, 27 A.D.3d 307, 307, 815 N.Y.S.2d 25 [2006], lv. denied 6 N.Y.3d 894, 817 N.Y.S.2d 629, 850 N.E.2d 676 [2006] ; People v. White, 259 A.D.2d at 400401, 687 N.Y.S.2d 329 [1999] ; People v. Rivera, 257 A.D.2d 425, 426, 683 N.Y.S.2d 513 [1999], lv. denied 93 N.Y.2d 901, 689 N.Y.S.2d 714, 711 N.E.2d 990 [1999] ). Accordingly, we must agree with defendant that his motion 141 A.D.3d 1028 to suppress the physical evidence found in his bedroom should have been granted and that this evidence should ... ...
-
People v. Gibson
... ... Garcia, 27 A.D.3d 307, 307, 815 N.Y.S.2d 25 [2006],lv. denied6 N.Y.3d 894, 817 N.Y.S.2d 629, 850 N.E.2d 676 [2006];People v. Rivera, 257 A.D.2d 425, 426, 683 N.Y.S.2d 513 [1999],lv. denied93 N.Y.2d 901, 689 N.Y.S.2d 714, 711 N.E.2d 990 [1999];People v. Love, 204 A.D.2d 97, 98, 610 N.Y.S.2d 958 [1994],affd.84 N.Y.2d 917, 620 N.Y.S.2d 809, 644 N.E.2d 1365 [1994];People v. DePaula, 179 A.D.2d 424, 426, 579 N.Y.S.2d 10 [1992];cf ... ...
-
People v. Perkins
... ... Even assuming, arguendo, that defendant's request to the court to charge the jury with respect to the specific date of each offense charged in the indictment was sufficient to preserve for our review his contention (cf. People v. Rivera , 257 A.D.2d 425, 425, 683 N.Y.S.2d 513 [1st Dept. 1999], lv denied 93 N.Y.2d 901, 689 N.Y.S.2d 714, 711 N.E.2d 990 [1999] ), we reject it. Although the complainant described several incidents of sexual contact with defendant, she was "quite specific in describing the ... distinct occasion[ ]" ... ...
-
People v. Vangorden
... ... Even assuming, arguendo, that defendant's contention is preserved for our review as a result of County Court's rejection of defendant's generalized assertion in his omnibus motion that the indictment "include[d] duplicitous counts" (cf. People v. Rivera, 257 A.D.2d 425, 425426, 683 N.Y.S.2d 513, lv. denied 93 N.Y.2d 901, 689 N.Y.S.2d 714, 711 N.E.2d 990 ; see generally People v. Allen, 24 N.Y.3d 441, 448450, 999 N.Y.S.2d 350, 24 N.E.3d 586 ), we conclude that it is without merit. " [T]here is no general requirement that the jury reach agreement on ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results