People v. Rivera

Decision Date24 February 1958
Citation5 A.D.2d 853,171 N.Y.S.2d 285
PartiesThe PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Aida Andino RIVERA, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

James J. Hanrahan, New York City, for appellant.

William I. Siegel, Brooklyn, for respondent.

Before NOLAN, P. J., and MURPHY, UGHETTA, HALLINAN and KLEINFELD, JJ.

MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.

Appeal (1) from a judgment of the County Court, Kings County, convicting appellant, on her plea of guilty, of petit larceny, and sentencing her to imprisonment in the New York City Penitentiary, and (2) from said sentence.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. See People v. Porfido, 279 App.Div. 1036, 112 N.Y.S.2d 110.

No separate appeal lies from the sentence, which has been reviewed on the appeal from the judgment of conviction.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • People v. Zuckerman
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • July 21, 1958
    ...a sentence (People v. Porfido, 279 App.Div. 1036, 112 N.Y.S.2d 110; People v. Baker, 280 App.Div. 899, 115 N.Y.S.2d 595; People v. Rivera, 5 A.D.2d 853, 171 N.Y.S.2d 285). No separate appeal lies from the sentence or from the order denying the motion for resentence, which have been reviewed......
  • People v. Zuckerman
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • April 9, 1959
    ...a sentence (People v. Porfido, 279 App.Div. 1036, 112 N.Y.S.2d 110; People v. Baker, 280 App.Div. 899, 115 N.Y.S.2d 595; People v. Rivera, 5 A.D.2d 853, 171 N.Y.S.2d 285).' The sole question before us is whether the Appellate Division has power to review an indeterminate penitentiary senten......
  • People v. French
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • February 24, 1958

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT